unconditional access to boxes gwuser1..gwuser3 for gwBoss01?

unconditional access to boxes gwuser1, gwuser2,gwuser3 for gwBoss01 ?
that gwuser1, gwuser2,gwuser3 couldn't limit access of gwBoss01.

Please, help me

Serg
  • In article <skoltogyan.7bp4gn@no-mx.forums.microfocus.com>, Skoltogyan
    wrote:
    > unconditional access to boxes gwuser1, gwuser2,gwuser3 for gwBoss01 ?
    > that gwuser1, gwuser2,gwuser3 couldn't limit access of gwBoss01.


    More details please
    Starting with is this Proxy that we are talking about
    if so, what sort of limiting access of the mailbox owner have you seen
    my Proxied in users?

    Exact versions of the POA and clients will be useful as well.


    Andy of
    http://KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
    Knowledge Partner
    http://forums.novell.com/member.php/75037-konecnya
    If you find a post helpful and are logged in the Web interface, please
    show your appreciation by clicking on the star below. Thanks!

  • konecnya;2421224 wrote:
    In article <skoltogyan.7bp4gn@no-mx.forums.microfocus.com>, Skoltogyan
    wrote:
    > unconditional access to boxes gwuser1, gwuser2,gwuser3 for gwBoss01 ?
    > that gwuser1, gwuser2,gwuser3 couldn't limit access of gwBoss01.


    More details please
    Starting with is this Proxy that we are talking about
    if so, what sort of limiting access of the mailbox owner have you seen
    my Proxied in users?

    Exact versions of the POA and clients will be useful as well.


    Andy of
    http://KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
    Knowledge Partner
    http://forums.novell.com/member.php/75037-konecnya
    If you find a post helpful and are logged in the Web interface, please
    show your appreciation by clicking on the star below. Thanks!



    access to gwuser1,gwuser2,gwuser3 boxes without the aid of users of gwuser1,gwuser2,gwuser3 is necessary.
    gwboss01 has to have access to their boxes(gwuser1,gwuser2,gwuser3) irrespective of - have allowed (gwuser1,gwuser2,gwuser3) or hasn't allowed

    GW2012 ( poa on the linux )
  • Hi Serg,

    If you mean see everything as in that the gw users cannot hide anything, then the boss will need to be able to login directly to those user accounts. Otherwise the users could mark items as private, and to the best of my knowledge nobody can see private items other than the owning user.

    Not to point out the obvious, but depending upon your jurisdiction, there are legal implications with this. Employee Computer policies need to be watertight to minimise the risk of something nasty occurring.

    Mark.
  • In article <skoltogyan.7br7gn@no-mx.forums.microfocus.com>, Skoltogyan
    wrote:
    > access to gwuser1,gwuser2,gwuser3 boxes without the aid of users of
    > gwuser1,gwuser2,gwuser3 is necessary.
    > gwboss01 has to have access to their boxes(gwuser1,gwuser2,gwuser3)
    > irrespective of - have allowed (gwuser1,gwuser2,gwuser3) or hasn't
    > allowed


    Users do have control over their Proxy settings and as Mark pointed out
    can also set things to private, so they always have that level of
    control to limit what others can see.
    So either those users have to share their passwords (password sharing
    is not recommended at all), or a good Archival product with all the
    appropriate controls in place for the gwboss01 to have discovery access
    to just those users.

    Certainly an area to step carefully and be sure of your local laws
    regarding privacy. The Archival product route is typically for legal
    discovery processes, and following some of those legal processes may
    well help guide you and those bosses as to what they are ultimately
    attempting to achieve. Talking with a lawyer on this should help you.


    Andy of
    http://KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
    Knowledge Partner
    http://forums.novell.com/member.php/75037-konecnya
    If you find a post helpful and are logged in the Web interface, please
    show your appreciation by clicking on the star below. Thanks!