Slow printing - larger print jobs when via iPrint

iPrint appliance 3.1
Windows 7 x64 client with v6.09 client
Konica Minolta C658 printer with Postscript 3 driver (10.1.1.0 or 9.16.1.0 tried)


If I print direct from Adobe Acrobat reader on the computer to printer with standard TCPIP port my 6.6MB PDF file renders out to a 200MB print job as shown in the Windows print monitor, and starts printing while spooling.

If I print via iPrint appliance the same PDF renders out to 8.17GB and must completely spool to the iPrint appliance before it starts spooling it to the printer.

I have tried enabling bidirectional in the Printer profile but this had no effect.

The store and forward behaviour I can live with (I expected that) if I can figure out why there is such a difference in rendered print job size between the two - I would have thought the raw output would be exactly the same direct and via iPrint.

Can anyone enlighten me as to what is happening here ?

We have replaced printer and upgraded (replaced) from iPrint v1.1 to V3.1 and now we get reports printing is slower !

Cheers
Ian
Parents
  • Update to above - the iprint window on the client shows the job as being around the 200MB size still when printing via Iprint, even though the Print spooler window on the same workstation is saying 8.17GB.

    So I guess I should ask - is v3.1 just slower than v1.1 of the appliance running on the same VMware physical hardware ?

    Will TID 7018252 make any difference if this is a single user printing at once ?

    Cheers
    Ian
  • On 19-03-18 07:44, iblackwood wrote:
    >
    > Update to above - the iprint window on the client shows the job as being
    > around the 200MB size still when printing via Iprint, even though the
    > Print spooler window on the same workstation is saying 8.17GB.
    >
    > So I guess I should ask - is v3.1 just slower than v1.1 of the appliance
    > running on the same VMware physical hardware ?
    >
    > Will TID 7018252 make any difference if this is a single user printing
    > at once ?
    >
    > Cheers
    > Ian
    >
    >

    1. The size of the print job when it has been rendered and it is ready
    to be sent for printing is always much larger that the "normal" size

    2. The print job rendering, and its size, is done by the driver itself.
    iPrint is not involved in the process.

    3. You're running appliance 3.1.1 then iprint client 9.12 should be
    available on the appliance to update. it contains some improvement
    regarding your current 6.09

    4. The real improvement to this issue will come with the next appliance
    patch. Apache/ipp_mod module buffer has been increased to improve speed
    with large print jobs. This fix has been already released for OES and it
    will be on next appliance patch. I do not have a current date but it
    should be soon, within a month.


Reply
  • On 19-03-18 07:44, iblackwood wrote:
    >
    > Update to above - the iprint window on the client shows the job as being
    > around the 200MB size still when printing via Iprint, even though the
    > Print spooler window on the same workstation is saying 8.17GB.
    >
    > So I guess I should ask - is v3.1 just slower than v1.1 of the appliance
    > running on the same VMware physical hardware ?
    >
    > Will TID 7018252 make any difference if this is a single user printing
    > at once ?
    >
    > Cheers
    > Ian
    >
    >

    1. The size of the print job when it has been rendered and it is ready
    to be sent for printing is always much larger that the "normal" size

    2. The print job rendering, and its size, is done by the driver itself.
    iPrint is not involved in the process.

    3. You're running appliance 3.1.1 then iprint client 9.12 should be
    available on the appliance to update. it contains some improvement
    regarding your current 6.09

    4. The real improvement to this issue will come with the next appliance
    patch. Apache/ipp_mod module buffer has been increased to improve speed
    with large print jobs. This fix has been already released for OES and it
    will be on next appliance patch. I do not have a current date but it
    should be soon, within a month.


Children