<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>New idea exchange ideas in CMS / Discovery &amp; CMDB</title>
    <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Discovery-CMDB/ct-p/ucmdb</link>
    <description>New idea exchange ideas in CMS / Discovery &amp; CMDB</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ucmdb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-18T12:59:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New item in the enumeration list location_type_enum</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/New-item-in-the-enumeration-list-location-type-enum/idi-p/2702289</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The enumeration list location_type_enum contains old values.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditorclipboard_image_0" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditorclipboard_image_1" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We need to update the list with possible items that can be populated from the cloud discovery jobs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Currently all the cloud discovery jobs which report Location CIs will report the attribute Location_type populated with the value Undefined, We should populate them with Cloud or something meaningful.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:28:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/New-item-in-the-enumeration-list-location-type-enum/idi-p/2702289</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnCI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-17T13:28:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Detailed integration statistics</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Detailed-integration-statistics/idi-p/2702222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We use the Service Manager Enhanced Adapter to transport data from the UCMDB to the Service Manager.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After a synchronization, you can see in the statistics window how many CI created, updated, deleted and failed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, it does not show which CIs were affected (created, updated, deleted and failed.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore, it would be good, with a click on the appropriate number to see also details (ate least the CI display_name). That would help us quickly with problems. This functionality should also be helpful with other push adapters.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:20:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Detailed-integration-statistics/idi-p/2702222</guid>
      <dc:creator>AMensching</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-17T06:20:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inventory only licenses  Use tag</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Inventory-only-licenses-Use-tag/idi-p/2702183</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;-Brief Description&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is reasons that we buy inventory only licenses because that is all that we want.&amp;nbsp; We didn’t care about the topology of them.&amp;nbsp; However, all topology discovery adapters will discover them regardless whether we want them to be inventory only or not.&amp;nbsp; This is so because the routers and switches and vCenter that provide those topology information like Layer2, will provide details of all connected devices.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;-Briefly describe your idea&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Inventory license only devices need to have a place of its own without regard to how the operation of the topology discovery adapters.&amp;nbsp; Topology connection information for those inventory license only devices can either be withheld or not getting update at all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;-Benefits / Value&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Keep the integrity of the product licensing to a point that customer can validate and plan accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;-Explain why is this important? (When used, by which role, and benefits / value)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If product license options that are sold on the basis of Full or Basic, then they must be honor as such.&amp;nbsp; The dynamic change of consumed licenses, that are due to discovery adapters, isn’t something that we customers can have control because those discovery adapters themselves have no control inherently. &amp;nbsp;This dynamic change actually is causing major headache because we have no control over how each device is to consume the license and thereby getting penalized for violation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Additionally, because the license consumption is an attribute that cannot be changed, all license updates by the discovery adapters are final, and change can only be done by deleting all nodes. This is very disruptive and unmanageable because all history will be gone, and the management and reporting of configuration changes will not be possible. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Inventory-only-licenses-Use-tag/idi-p/2702183</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kumkum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-17T00:54:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For UCMDB –CIT integration there should be a format defined for a data export to include all the TQL</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/For-UCMDB-CIT-integration-there-should-be-a-format-defined-for-a/idi-p/2702102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For&amp;nbsp;UCMDB-CIT&amp;nbsp;integration&amp;nbsp;there&amp;nbsp;should&amp;nbsp;be&amp;nbsp;an&amp;nbsp;OOTB&amp;nbsp;solution&amp;nbsp;available&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;export&amp;nbsp;data&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;particular&amp;nbsp;format&amp;nbsp;meaning&amp;nbsp;:&amp;nbsp;All&amp;nbsp;its&amp;nbsp;running&amp;nbsp;software&amp;nbsp;under&amp;nbsp;its&amp;nbsp;related&amp;nbsp;node.&lt;BR /&gt;This&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;an&amp;nbsp;enhancement&amp;nbsp;request&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;define&amp;nbsp;such&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;format&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:20:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/For-UCMDB-CIT-integration-there-should-be-a-format-defined-for-a/idi-p/2702102</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnLaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-16T16:20:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>close UCMDB Job thread workers and release the DB Thread Pools to return memory to the System</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/close-UCMDB-Job-thread-workers-and-release-the-DB-Thread-Pools/idi-p/2702067</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;UCMDB Probe Job Thread workers are shared pool workers, once they are created, they will never be destroyed.&amp;nbsp; The same is true with the DB Pool Threads where once created, they are never to be destroyed. The only controlling mechanism is the maximum worker and maximum number of DB Thread pool.&amp;nbsp; Such a systematic behavior lead to the ever growing consumption of the system memory without ever returning them to the system.&amp;nbsp; Eventually, the system will be brought down to its knees where routine diagnostics of the system cannot be done unless the probe is restarted.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;System administrators often are tasked to maximize the usage of the system resources.&amp;nbsp; With the above system behavior, we often have to budget at least 4G of RAM that are free at all time knowing that the system once start running the jobs, it will take up all the available memory.&amp;nbsp; In the world of VM, the above system behavior works against the principle of resource sharing.&amp;nbsp; This becomes the serious offender when we know those worker threads and DB Pool Threads are simply idling in the background.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a result, we are requesting that those Job Workers and DB Thread Pools once finished their tasks, they shall be closed.&amp;nbsp; Then for performance reasons, they can be closed only after a certain amount of idling time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The same is true for the "xmlenricher_service.exe" which is the enrichment process for the handling of the scan files.&amp;nbsp; They too only get activated when scan files is available.&amp;nbsp; Once all scanning activity are done, they too remain as idling in the background with all the memory gobbled up where the only way to control its use is through the maximum memory parameter.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In our environment, the probe scans the server and network devices once a week, and those jobs literally are all completed within one day of time during the weekend.&amp;nbsp; As you can see, after the job is completed, without any extra buffering of the memory, the system would be remaining at over 95% use of all system memories.&amp;nbsp; In that scenario, it is difficult to make any attempts to log into the system and execute any kind of commands.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:29:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/close-UCMDB-Job-thread-workers-and-release-the-DB-Thread-Pools/idi-p/2702067</guid>
      <dc:creator>jxliang101</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-16T14:29:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UCMDB job status change after job not started at scheduled time</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/UCMDB-job-status-change-after-job-not-started-at-scheduled-time/idi-p/2701982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i would like to suggest a change in UCMDB UI Job displayed status when the job was not started at scheduled time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My Customers expectation is to see in UI (informationally for Admin or Operator) that the job was not run at scheduled time.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Now, once the job skippes (no mather the reason) the scheduled run, We still see the latest status - in our case Successfull (green, which is actually wrong),&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Proper status in that situation should be anything else but not "green", because there was something disturbing in correct working.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In my case, the skipped job has been found, because some very important system (MF Service Manager) was not supplied with fresh data and Business unit was lack with info.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For instance. Think about some less important system which&amp;nbsp;was not supplied 5 or 10 times in row. In UCMDB UI We would still see a SUCCESS status.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;KR,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;jakub&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:55:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/UCMDB-job-status-change-after-job-not-started-at-scheduled-time/idi-p/2701982</guid>
      <dc:creator>jakub_z</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-16T07:55:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ability to add an Reconciliation_IDENTIFICATION_EXCLUDE rule by a simple rest API</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-add-an-Reconciliation-IDENTIFICATION-EXCLUDE-rule-by/idi-p/2701484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A Reconciliation_IDENTIFICATION_EXCLUDE can be inserted by jmx, it could be useful that we can insert/delete these type of rules by a simple rest api.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Stefano FERRI&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:47:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-add-an-Reconciliation-IDENTIFICATION-EXCLUDE-rule-by/idi-p/2701484</guid>
      <dc:creator>Siryo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-14T10:47:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Request to enhance the scanner to be able to get the list of the oraInventory from a file</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Request-to-enhance-the-scanner-to-be-able-to-get-the-list-of-the/idi-p/2700779</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This request is related to the Oracle inventory. This is a request to enhance the scanner to be able to get the list of the oraInventory from a file.&lt;BR /&gt;This is needed when then is no unique central inventory but multiple oraInventory in case the Oracle installations on a same server are fully separated from each others and Oracle not necessarily installed via the Oracle Universal Installer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 09:08:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Request-to-enhance-the-scanner-to-be-able-to-get-the-list-of-the/idi-p/2700779</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nathalie Niderkorn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-09T09:08:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kubernetes discovery additional Node CI attributes</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Kubernetes-discovery-additional-Node-CI-attributes/idi-p/2700417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;During Kubernetes&amp;nbsp;discovery, flat Node CIs are created and in order to collapse/merge with existing CIs we recommend the following attributes, if applicable and can be populated from K8 API.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Name (Note, the field should be populated with&amp;nbsp;hostname&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;not the FQDN. Case SD02563360)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Domain Name&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Serial Number&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;MAC Address (with related Interface)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Related IP&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Name&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Populate Authoritative DNS with the FQDN (wish list, not required).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Related Interface&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;We understand if any of the above attributes are not accessible during the discovery due to limitations within K9 API, however at minimum Name, however one other key attribute would be much appreciated to obtain the most possible accurate&amp;nbsp;merge or no merge reconciliation condition during data-in.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 19:34:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Kubernetes-discovery-additional-Node-CI-attributes/idi-p/2700417</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbspencer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-07T19:34:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Include sequence number in compound relations</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Include-sequence-number-in-compound-relations/idi-p/2700387</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, when displaying compound relations it will helpful to include a sequence number (and actually display the lines in sequence).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you define complex compound relations that use the same CI types, it becomes difficult to understand what the compound relation is supposed to do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have included an example of a virtual compound with 8 elements that reuses 3 different CIT:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://dcvta86296.i.lithium.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17182iC094A50F02F769D2/image-size/large?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=999" alt="VirtualCompoundRelationsSequence.png" title="VirtualCompoundRelationsSequence.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Benoit&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 15:32:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Include-sequence-number-in-compound-relations/idi-p/2700387</guid>
      <dc:creator>bnadon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-07T15:32:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Create list of all triggered CIs for a discovery job</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Create-list-of-all-triggered-CIs-for-a-discovery-job/idi-p/2700195</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to get a list of all of the triggered CIs for a particular discovery job? The Discovery Status job will report CI's which ended with warning or error. I am looking for a way to get all triggered CIs including those which were successful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, I would like to get a list of all of the triggered CI's for host connection by shell. I would then compare that list against other sources to help verify that everything in the environment is getting discovered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Create-list-of-all-triggered-CIs-for-a-discovery-job/idi-p/2700195</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul Meaders</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-06T14:23:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Concurrent Credentials update by 2 persons</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Concurrent-Credentials-update-by-2-persons/idi-p/2700146</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If 2 people are updating credentials at the same time, the person who saves 2nd wipes out the updates done by the 1st person.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2019 05:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Concurrent-Credentials-update-by-2-persons/idi-p/2700146</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tilak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-05T05:00:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Browser Support</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Browser-Support/idi-p/2700145</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently the only usable browser is IE (which has be deprecated). Most popular browsers have dropped Java support including Chrome, Edge, Edge (Chromium), Firefox.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2019 04:58:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Browser-Support/idi-p/2700145</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tilak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-05T04:58:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bulk Credential Upload</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Bulk-Credential-Upload/idi-p/2700144</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;UCMDB should provide some process for bulk upload of credentials for probes. This could be either thru&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- CSV file&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- API into various password repositories (i.e. PasswordSafe)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2019 04:54:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Bulk-Credential-Upload/idi-p/2700144</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tilak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-05T04:54:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Change discovery credentials through rest-api</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Change-discovery-credentials-through-rest-api/idi-p/2700034</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We would like to change the discovery credentials through the rest-api in the UCMDB.&lt;BR /&gt;Is this possible?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 10:59:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Change-discovery-credentials-through-rest-api/idi-p/2700034</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gidarno</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-04T10:59:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CIT export to include attributes qualifiers</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CIT-export-to-include-attributes-qualifiers/idi-p/2699718</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-quilt-row lia-quilt-row-message-subject"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-quilt-column lia-quilt-column-24 lia-quilt-column-single lia-quilt-column-message-subject-content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-quilt-column-alley lia-quilt-column-alley-single"&gt;&lt;DIV class="topic-subject-wrapper"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-subject lia-component-message-view-widget-subject"&gt;&lt;DIV class="MessageSubject"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: inherit;"&gt;We would like a way to export the uCMDB Class Model for a given CI Type so that the attributes qualifiers are included (Visible, Key, Mandatory, Managed, ...) in the excel export.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="MessageSubject"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:17:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CIT-export-to-include-attributes-qualifiers/idi-p/2699718</guid>
      <dc:creator>bnadon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-02T18:17:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UD to capture Snapshot reserve capacity size (true total capacity)</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/UD-to-capture-Snapshot-reserve-capacity-size-true-total-capacity/idi-p/2699304</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We observed in the process of discovering volume size of the Storage Volumes, UD is discovering only the total size of the volumes but its not capturing the snapshot reserve size of the volumes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Customers requirement is to get the volume size as both total volume size + snapshot reserve size of the volume. So it will be great if you fix this issue in forth coming patch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MAhesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:34:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/UD-to-capture-Snapshot-reserve-capacity-size-true-total-capacity/idi-p/2699304</guid>
      <dc:creator>myenni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-01T10:34:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add the hextoraw functionality to improve the CI history information tab response</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-the-hextoraw-functionality-to-improve-the-CI-history/idi-p/2699108</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The UCMDB is already using the&amp;nbsp;hextoraw function over the&amp;nbsp;98+% of the time, The recommendation is to set that function at the 100%&amp;nbsp; of the sql querys to avoid the impact over the UCMDB performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Performance: Modify the queries to set the hextoraw function (as per almost all the queries in UCMDB)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Original Query, access index by start_time&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT ID,CMDB_ID,END1_ID,END2_ID,START_TIME,CHANGE_TYPE,CHANGER_INFO,CHANGER_DATASTORE FROM HDM_190710COMPOSITION_1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE 1=1&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND START_TIME &amp;gt;= :v0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND START_TIME &amp;lt;= :v1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND HDM_190710COMPOSITION_1.END1_ID IN ( :v2 )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND HDM_190710COMPOSITION_1.CHANGE_TYPE IN ( :v3 ,&amp;nbsp; :v4 ,&amp;nbsp; :v5,&amp;nbsp; :v6 )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tune query , access by end1_id&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT ID,CMDB_ID,END1_ID,END2_ID,START_TIME,CHANGE_TYPE,CHANGER_INFO,CHANGER_DATASTORE FROM HDM_190710COMPOSITION_1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE 1=1&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND START_TIME &amp;gt;= :v0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND START_TIME &amp;lt;= :v1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND HDM_190710COMPOSITION_1.END1_ID IN hextoraw( :v2 )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND HDM_190710COMPOSITION_1.CHANGE_TYPE IN ( :v3 ,&amp;nbsp; :v4 ,&amp;nbsp; :v5,&amp;nbsp; :v6 )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Case:&amp;nbsp;SD02532257 Performance: Modificar el código para agregar la función hextoraw&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:39:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-the-hextoraw-functionality-to-improve-the-CI-history/idi-p/2699108</guid>
      <dc:creator>MonitoringTeam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-03T13:39:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UD Agent  process crashes with an application error</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/UD-Agent-process-crashes-with-an-application-error/idi-p/2699084</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;UD Agent process crashes with an application error when the load of the target server becomes heavy like 100% of CPU usage while running discovery jobs. It seems to be a bug.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The UD Agent should not crash with an application error immediately. I think, for instance, it should wait for a little time and retry to perform commands.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UCMDB Version: 10.33 CP24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Windows Event Log is shown below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ログの名前: Application&lt;BR /&gt;ソース: Application Error&lt;BR /&gt;日付: 2019/08/21 17:16:34&lt;BR /&gt;イベント ID: 1000&lt;BR /&gt;タスクのカテゴリ: アプリケーション クラッシュ イベント&lt;BR /&gt;レベル: エラー&lt;BR /&gt;キーワード: クラシック&lt;BR /&gt;ユーザー: N/A&lt;BR /&gt;コンピューター: ucmdb-ip21&lt;BR /&gt;説明:&lt;BR /&gt;障害が発生しているアプリケーション名: discagnt.exe、バージョン: 0.0.0.0、タイム スタンプ: 0x5d4bcd6d&lt;BR /&gt;障害が発生しているモジュール名: ntdll.dll、バージョン: 6.3.9600.18895、タイム スタンプ: 0x5a4b127e&lt;BR /&gt;例外コード: 0xc0000005&lt;BR /&gt;障害オフセット: 0x00041778&lt;BR /&gt;障害が発生しているプロセス ID: 0x278c&lt;BR /&gt;障害が発生しているアプリケーションの開始時刻: 0x01d557f85f5fbaf4&lt;BR /&gt;障害が発生しているアプリケーション パス: C:\Program Files (x86)\Hewlett-Packard\Discovery Agent\bin32\discagnt.exe&lt;BR /&gt;障害が発生しているモジュール パス: C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll&lt;BR /&gt;レポート ID: fcad2329-c3eb-11e9-80cc-000c2996b0e7&lt;BR /&gt;イベント XML:&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Event xmlns="&lt;A href="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event" target="_blank"&gt;http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event&lt;/A&gt;"&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;System&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Provider Name="Application Error" /&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;EventID Qualifiers="0"&amp;gt;1000&amp;lt;/EventID&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Level&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/Level&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Task&amp;gt;100&amp;lt;/Task&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Keywords&amp;gt;0x80000000000000&amp;lt;/Keywords&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;TimeCreated SystemTime="2019-08-21T08:16:34.000000000Z" /&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;EventRecordID&amp;gt;83441&amp;lt;/EventRecordID&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Channel&amp;gt;Application&amp;lt;/Channel&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Computer&amp;gt;ucmdb-ip21&amp;lt;/Computer&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Security /&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;/System&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;EventData&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;discagnt.exe&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;0.0.0.0&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;5d4bcd6d&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;ntdll.dll&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;6.3.9600.18895&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;5a4b127e&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;c0000005&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;00041778&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;278c&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;01d557f85f5fbaf4&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;C:\Program Files (x86)\Hewlett-Packard\Discovery Agent\bin32\discagnt.exe&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;fcad2329-c3eb-11e9-80cc-000c2996b0e7&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;/Data&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;/EventData&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;/Event&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/UD-Agent-process-crashes-with-an-application-error/idi-p/2699084</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hitachi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-30T10:38:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ability to discover IBM Storage array devices (A9000R000)</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-discover-IBM-Storage-array-devices-A9000R000/idi-p/2698762</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Micro Focus reviewed in support case SD02547807, and determined there is no ability to discover these IBM Storage array devices.&amp;nbsp; They support older/different IBM storage devices.&amp;nbsp; Can we get these added to the discovery job/jobs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:19:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-discover-IBM-Storage-array-devices-A9000R000/idi-p/2698762</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gregory Pappas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-26T17:19:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Make Document Root Technical Name consistent between Ci Types</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Make-Document-Root-Technical-Name-consistent-between-Ci-Types/idi-p/2698603</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently, the Document Root attribute in the apache CI Type has a technical name of document_root.&amp;nbsp; However the Document Root attribute in the webvirtualhost CI Type has a technical name of documentroot.&amp;nbsp; This requires additional coding/handling for downstream applications since the technical names are not consistent.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having consistent technical names for the same named attributes across all CI types reduces confusion and prevents additional coding/handling for downstream applications.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:35:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Make-Document-Root-Technical-Name-consistent-between-Ci-Types/idi-p/2698603</guid>
      <dc:creator>karitbrown</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-25T23:35:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discover ORACLE HOME and ORACLE Alert Log Files Dir</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discover-ORACLE-HOME-and-ORACLE-Alert-Log-Files-Dir/idi-p/2698451</link>
      <description>&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Brief Description&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our idea is to expand the current Oracle Discovery pattern to be able to not only gather the data for ORACLE_HOME, but also have a home for it as well inside the UCMDB. Alongside, getting a attribute field for the data for ORACLE_HOME, we would also like to propose the idea of also gathering the data for the location of alert log files for Oracle as well.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Benefits/Value&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;These enhancements benefit use greatly in helping provide the best monitoring of any Oracle Databases that our customers would like to have monitored. This data will be used today for testing monitoring templates which again will be used for the benefit of our customers when we onboard Oracle DBs if they wish to have them monitored. This data will help with finding the location of the oracle software in the Oracle DB, another crucial piece for the monitoring.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Design Details&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For ORACLE_HOME we would like to see this data populate the attribute on the Oracle instance CI itself - Application Installed Path. This would suffice just fine for creating the monitoring templates now. For the future, however, if it can be made into a separate CI class itself and a composition relationship from the Oracle DB Instance to the new ORACLE_HOME CI, this method would be the best says the Oracle DB admin from the Oracle team that is creating these templates. And for the alert log file, if it is possible for this data to be housed in a Log File CI. We have similar Log File CIs for our IIS Discovery and if we could possibly replicate how the data is being stored for an IIS Log File, figured the same could be done for Oracle Log File CIs. The Log File CI would be in a composition relationship from the Oracle instance to the Log File CI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:07:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discover-ORACLE-HOME-and-ORACLE-Alert-Log-Files-Dir/idi-p/2698451</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kumkum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-25T14:07:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Make Views "Not Active" by default to increase performance</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Make-Views-quot-Not-Active-quot-by-default-to-increase/idi-p/2698208</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;by default if you create a new view in modeling studio it will get a priority of &lt;STRONG&gt;Medium&lt;/STRONG&gt; which means it will be re-calculated every 30 seconds. however this it not required as an end user only needs to see the view results on demand.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also all the views which are deployed with UCMDB out of the box should be changed to "Not Active" as usually 99% of the existing ootb views are not used by anyone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess (hope) reducing the number of active TQLs could save quite some load on the system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;daniel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:09:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Make-Views-quot-Not-Active-quot-by-default-to-increase/idi-p/2698208</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Engelmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-24T15:09:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>non privleged PowerShell discovery</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/non-privleged-PowerShell-discovery/idi-p/2698114</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are currently discovering windows servers with PowerCMD, but want to discover with the PowerShell discovery, but there are some things we noticed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. The PowerShell discovery needs .Net3.5 and the Powershell2.0 engine installed in order to run&lt;BR /&gt;Our company security does not allow us to use these old and deprecated versions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. You need to be local administrator in order to do the discovery right.&lt;BR /&gt;Our company does not allow the discovery user to be local admin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. The PowerShell discovery uses a powershellconnector.exe on the probe&lt;BR /&gt;this connector is limited in it's use and does not support all the powershell commands&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our Windows administrators asked us if it is possible to edit the powershell discovery so we can connect to another powershell configuration that supports JEA (Just Enough Admin) which allows the discovery user to be a virtual local admin during the discovery and deletes it's privileges after the discovery is finished. This way it's more secure. We've tested it with the PowerCMD discovery and it works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Gidarno&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:31:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/non-privleged-PowerShell-discovery/idi-p/2698114</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gidarno</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-24T10:31:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OEM Discovery</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/OEM-Discovery/idi-p/2698111</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the past we received a OEM adapter, but due to company restrictions we weren't able to discover OEM.&lt;BR /&gt;I recently obtained credentials to connect to OEM and i can execute the SQL statements that the discovery tries to execute. We now run into another problem, we can only connect to OEM through remote oracle listeners on it's servicename.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the current connection (Host, SID) does no longer work.&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to change de discovery so that we can connect through oracle listeners with it's servicename?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Gidarno&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/OEM-Discovery/idi-p/2698111</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gidarno</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-24T10:18:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discovering SQL Error log location</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovering-SQL-Error-log-location/idi-p/2698004</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The current MSSQL discovery pattern cannot locate MSSQL error logs' location. These logs are crucial for our monitoring team to create monitoning templates that will be used for our customers when they want their MSSQL servers monitored. Someone from the MSSQL team has created a sql command that he hopes will help in expanding the current MSSQL discovery pattern to find the location of the error log files.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here's the sql command from the MSSQL team member:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;SELECT&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;value_data AS [Errorlog directory]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;FROM sys.dm_server_registry&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;WHERE&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;registry_key LIKE N'%MSSQLServer\Parameters' and convert(varchar,value_data) like '-e%'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This query will provide output as follows –&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Errorlog directory&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-eC:\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL11.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\Log\ERRORLOG&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;They need to truncate first 2 character i.e. “-e” which will give directory location.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not quite sure where this directory can be placed once this has been added and we can discover the error log location.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:27:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovering-SQL-Error-log-location/idi-p/2698004</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaneB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-23T18:27:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Online help is no longer available after UCMDB 10.33</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Online-help-is-no-longer-available-after-UCMDB-10-33/idi-p/2697980</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;According to support online help is no longer available after UCMDB 10.33.&amp;nbsp; Some customers do not have their production UCMDB connected to the internet or the connection could be slow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think it should be available as is online help for other products, though maybe online help is going away for all products.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:28:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Online-help-is-no-longer-available-after-UCMDB-10-33/idi-p/2697980</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mel Farber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-23T16:28:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unable to specify domain name through CyberArk authentication for VIM protocol</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Unable-to-specify-domain-name-through-CyberArk-authentication/idi-p/2697779</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;-Brief Description&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Unable to specify domain name through CyberArk authentication for VIM protocol &amp;nbsp;to query VCenter&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-&lt;STRONG&gt;Benefits / Value&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-CyberArk does not store user domain information, while authentication to vCenter or any other system, user domain is critical in identifying the user. Therefore, it is critical that the user domain be made available to specify by the UD Administrators; presently the work around is to have vCenter set the default that matches the UD User domain name. Additionally, when referencing the CyberArk Object in UD, UD has a syntax verification that disallows the use of “.” in the Object name; this caused integration problem with the CyberArk, and the present workaround is to have CyberArk manually alter the default Object name to accommodate the limitation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-&lt;STRONG&gt;Design details&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-A separate field named User Domain Name is required, and remove the syntax verification of the CyberArk Objection name during the configuration of the CyberArk settings in UD.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Unable-to-specify-domain-name-through-CyberArk-authentication/idi-p/2697779</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kumkum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-20T20:38:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pulling Tenant information in UCMDB-NNMi Topology Integration</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Pulling-Tenant-information-in-UCMDB-NNMi-Topology-Integration/idi-p/2697675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In Multi-tenant environment, default UCMDB-NNMi Topology Integration adapter does not pull tenant information of monitored node to UCMDB. Currently tenant assignment is managed in UCMDB by using "Tenant Assignment Rules" based on Naming conventions and IP ranges. But it is very risky and forces customer to follow some norms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since tenant information is very much important in Multi-Tenant environment, it should be updated automatically during Topology Sync.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rohit Naik&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:22:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Pulling-Tenant-information-in-UCMDB-NNMi-Topology-Integration/idi-p/2697675</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rohit_N</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-20T11:22:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Include tail / grep utilities in UCMDB on both Probe and Server</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Include-tail-grep-utilities-in-UCMDB-on-both-Probe-and-Server/idi-p/2697514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please add a tail / grep utility on both the UCMDB server and Probe out of the box.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 15:23:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Include-tail-grep-utilities-in-UCMDB-on-both-Probe-and-Server/idi-p/2697514</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith_Paschal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-19T15:23:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ability to create a calulated attribute on the cit</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-create-a-calulated-attribute-on-the-cit/idi-p/2696974</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we would like to have the ability to create a calculated attribute that can be similar to display label (so that can be combined with one or more attributes), but with the regex possibility for use part of the text.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is can be used for example for create an attribute that reports all details of an operating system in one attribute, for example: Suse 12 Enterprise x64 sp3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This could be done without more expensive enrichment rules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stefano&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:29:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-create-a-calulated-attribute-on-the-cit/idi-p/2696974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Siryo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-17T09:29:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ability to do a clear probe cache for a single element and not for all the job</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-do-a-clear-probe-cache-for-a-single-element-and-not/idi-p/2696825</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to propose a new feature on ucmdb. Normally we can do an entire probe clear cache or a job probe clear cache, but, in some cases can be usefull a single item clear cache.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example host and application by shell is a job that when there are a great number of discovered nodes has major impact on the ucmdb queue when we do a clear probe cache (job). In this job happen usually that a node reports wrong data for the probe cache issues, and in the most of this cases can be solved by a single item clear cache.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Stefano&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:06:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-do-a-clear-probe-cache-for-a-single-element-and-not/idi-p/2696825</guid>
      <dc:creator>Siryo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-16T15:06:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discovery of NoSQL Databases</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovery-of-NoSQL-Databases/idi-p/2696757</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As I can't see anything like this currently in the product and on the roadmap as well:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would like to suggest thinking of discovery mechanisms for &lt;STRONG&gt;NoSQL databases&lt;/STRONG&gt; (e.g. MongoDB, Couchbase...).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A lot of customers are asking for such functionality, as especially big data products seem to rely on those - and as those would normally also be modeled in the Service and Application trees, that would definitely make sense from my point of view.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And it would also be a USP against other vendors out there...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovery-of-NoSQL-Databases/idi-p/2696757</guid>
      <dc:creator>T_Schaefer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-16T11:46:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ability to display a relation attribute to a report</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-display-a-relation-attribute-to-a-report/idi-p/2696746</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we build a report we can choose only CIT attribute, we need the ability to add an attribute of relation too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have opened a service request on may 2015 (SR: 4651474495 CASEID: SD01146124), this SR has an enhancement request number QCCR1H102199.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stefano&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:56:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-display-a-relation-attribute-to-a-report/idi-p/2696746</guid>
      <dc:creator>Siryo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-16T09:56:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>uCMDB - Oracle IDM SSO</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/uCMDB-Oracle-IDM-SSO/idi-p/2696593</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;uCMDB should support the use of Oracle IDM SSO for the SSO needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even thought we can make the Oracle IDM work with uCMDB today, the session timeouts and the user inactive timeout has to be managed separately and doesn't work as intended.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 19:09:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/uCMDB-Oracle-IDM-SSO/idi-p/2696593</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samaadan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T19:09:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add history to probe dashboard</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-history-to-probe-dashboard/idi-p/2696571</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the probe dashboard we can see current CPU, Disk and Memory consumption on a probe.&amp;nbsp; Please add the ability to look at the dashboard over time (i.e. trending).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-history-to-probe-dashboard/idi-p/2696571</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith_Paschal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T16:29:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add probe OS to viewSystemInformation</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-probe-OS-to-viewSystemInformation/idi-p/2696570</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently viewSystemInformation looks like this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;*** System information ***
Version: 2019.05
Server version: 11.5.0 build: 217
OS: Windows Server 2016 version 10.0
DB: [ftc06ucm20] at Postgresql on [ftc06ucm33.swinfra.net:5432] with userName [qUKzfM+vWoE7FDLKogmkO50UTketDeFUnCicJT5VbNU=] with password [*******] with SSL connection [false] with SQL Server certificate trusted [false]
MT: disabled
Hotfixes Applied: license   
HA: Is_ha_enabled = true
		Cluster_name = postgresql_ftc06ucm20
		Cluster_nodes_names = [ftc06ucm20_1568235142628]
		Cluster_node_number = 1
Customers [Total of 1 customer(s)]:
		[Customer ID: 1, Name: Default Client, CP: 2019.05.122Description: Default Client, Config ID: 1]
Probe: FTC06UCM20, version: 11.5.0.217, build: 217&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It would be amazing if I could figure out from this output that the probe is a linux probe or a windows probe.&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:27:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-probe-OS-to-viewSystemInformation/idi-p/2696570</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith_Paschal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T16:27:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Possibility of adding bulk  recipients   to "Recipients Manager"</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Possibility-of-adding-bulk-recipients-to-quot-Recipients-Manager/idi-p/2696553</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Possibility of adding bulk recipients to "Recipients Manager"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It should be possible to add a list of recipients to "Recipients Manager".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This list could be an excel, a CiCollection or users belonging to an "Active Directory" group&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(see&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Create-a-collection-of-users-with-all-member-of-Active-Directory/idi-p/2696551" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Create-a-collection-of-users-with-all-member-of-Active-Directory/idi-p/2696551&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:47:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Possibility-of-adding-bulk-recipients-to-quot-Recipients-Manager/idi-p/2696553</guid>
      <dc:creator>Davide Dargenio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T14:47:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Create a collection of users with all member of Active Directory group</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Create-a-collection-of-users-with-all-member-of-Active-Directory/idi-p/2696551</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Create a collection of users with all member of Active Directory group&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Create a discovery able to found all users belonging to a group in active directory and group them together.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This group could be used to do further activities like add a group of users as recipient of a report&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Create-a-collection-of-users-with-all-member-of-Active-Directory/idi-p/2696551</guid>
      <dc:creator>Davide Dargenio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T14:36:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tool to import to user.zsai from xml, for exemple</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Tool-to-import-to-user-zsai-from-xml-for-exemple/idi-p/2696535</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have noticed it is possible to export a user.zsai file to an xml, for external processing, for exemple.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be great if a tool the other way around existed, meening being able to generate a user.zsai file doing a "Import from file", select xml file, in the case of mass modifications needed of this user.zsai file.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, the xml will have to respect the needed structure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why does this tool not already exist?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:13:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Tool-to-import-to-user-zsai-from-xml-for-exemple/idi-p/2696535</guid>
      <dc:creator>florian_miceli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T13:13:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CMS UI - Filter report resuts</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CMS-UI-Filter-report-resuts/idi-p/2696280</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the CMS UI Report we have the ability to filter the results by any&amp;nbsp;column extracted by the report&amp;nbsp;(like filter in xls)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today we need to extract the report in xls and then apply the filter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:33:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CMS-UI-Filter-report-resuts/idi-p/2696280</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paolo Liberali</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-12T09:33:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discovering Maximum Size for SQL File</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovering-Maximum-Size-for-SQL-File/idi-p/2696188</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After opening a ticket and working with a support person from MicroFocus to help in our discovery for MSSQL. The ticket specifically was open to help get the attribute Maximum Size populated for the SQL File CI. I received word from the support person who talked with a senior engineer about the case and they checked the OOTB scripts and they found that unfortunately there are no scripts for the SQL jobs that can discover this Maximum Size attribute. This was a suggestion from them to post this idea here in the Idea Exchange for a enhancement request for future releases to be able to discover this data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently this is a required attribute from our MSSQL monitoring team to help them create monitoring templates that will be used for our customers for any MSSQL DBs they would like to have monitored.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 20:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovering-Maximum-Size-for-SQL-File/idi-p/2696188</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaneB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-11T20:36:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add Azure Scale Sets to Discovery</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-Azure-Scale-Sets-to-Discovery/idi-p/2695852</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From the website below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Azure virtual machine scale sets let you create and manage a group of identical, load balanced VMs. The number of VM instances can automatically increase or decrease in response to demand or a defined schedule. Scale sets provide high availability to your applications, and allow you to centrally manage, configure, and update a large number of VMs. With virtual machine scale sets, you can build large-scale services for areas such as compute, big data, and container workloads.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machine-scale-sets/overview" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machine-scale-sets/overview&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A lot of our use of Azure will be for containers so we need to see the scale sets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-Azure-Scale-Sets-to-Discovery/idi-p/2695852</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichardS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-10T08:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discover OS Groups</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discover-OS-Groups/idi-p/2695738</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, the scanner discovers the OS users with and attribute "User Group ID" which contains the ID of the user's primary group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to have all OS groups with relationships to all their members (groups or users). The groups are most often used to define permissions to files, directory and other things on a node.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 15:55:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discover-OS-Groups/idi-p/2695738</guid>
      <dc:creator>ViauJoc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T15:55:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Automated service Modeling - Improve documentation along with scenarios or examples</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Automated-service-Modeling-Improve-documentation-along-with/idi-p/2695590</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I never seen any documentation related to Automated service modeling where it explains how to discover. I have seen many customers trying to do this discovery but failed. But what are the prerequisites ? what are the best practices ? I remember i tried to discover ucmdb application itself ( Starting with its URL ) and its not able to do the discovery properly. And i am sure it didn't because i may be doing it in wrong way. But i was unable to find a documentation related to how to do this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With some best practices, scenarios, or limitations or permissions which are required for this to discover everything. I am sure this will add value to the tool.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 18:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Automated-service-Modeling-Improve-documentation-along-with/idi-p/2695590</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohd_25</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-07T18:44:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cloud Foundry discovery associates all foundations to a single Application System CI</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Cloud-Foundry-discovery-associates-all-foundations-to-a-single/idi-p/2695556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently PCF discovery associates all independent foundations to a single Application System&amp;nbsp;(, Cloud Foundry CI with Display Label/Name of Pivotal Application Service), which obscures the view into independent instances of PCF (URI Endpoints). We would like to see a different grouping than currently: Discovery should group all the CIs associated with the Cloud Foundry application system that are relevant for a URI Endpoint. URI Endpoint should be a container with components related downstream (like the node CI is modelled).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 21:41:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Cloud-Foundry-discovery-associates-all-foundations-to-a-single/idi-p/2695556</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbspencer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-06T21:41:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASM for SMAX and other container based applications</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/ASM-for-SMAX-and-other-container-based-applications/idi-p/2695452</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;It would be nice if the Automated System Modeling is able to discovery SMAX.&lt;BR /&gt;An enhancement at the ASM discovery for kubernetes, would be required.&lt;BR /&gt;As more and more web applications are container based, it would be great if ASM is actually able to model and reflect the changes automatically.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;BR /&gt;Emil Dutsov&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 08:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/ASM-for-SMAX-and-other-container-based-applications/idi-p/2695452</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emil Dutsov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-06T08:45:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CMS UI Banner</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CMS-UI-Banner/idi-p/2695335</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It would be useful when the header of the CMS UI could easily be modified (at the moment it’s static, could only be changed in infrastructure setting).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It should be a notification (as it is in other MF tools) e.g. to communicate a downtime next week or server restart or maintenance window.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Should be bold and colourful, so an user is aware of the message.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It’s something like the Splash Screen, but it should be shown always. Otherwise the user just click it and forget&amp;nbsp; it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:01:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CMS-UI-Banner/idi-p/2695335</guid>
      <dc:creator>MSchmitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-05T14:01:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Virtualbox extension pack Recognition issue</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Virtualbox-extension-pack-Recognition-issue/idi-p/2695252</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The software "Virtualbox extension pack"(a plguin of Virtualbox) install on windows, but it was not discovered by uCMDB 10.33&amp;nbsp; at the beginning , after report this issue to R&amp;amp;D we got a hotfix which recognize "Virtualbox extension pack" base on some special files,for example:VBox*.dll (the hotfix was already include in the latest DK package). But when the "Virtualbox" software uninstalled from the device, the "Virtualbox extension pack" installedSoftware CI remain in uCMDB and sacn file,the root cause is that the VBox*.dll files are not deleted during the uninstallation,which means the recognition base on file is not a good solution for "Virtualbox extension pack"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From customer's perspective , when the software uninstalled from device ,there should no "Virtualbox extension pack " and "Virtualbox" in uCMDB and scan file any more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We found some entry of "Virtualbox extension pack " in the registry ,but the entry not in the below location:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall&lt;BR /&gt;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;any suggestions are highly appreciate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 09:05:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Virtualbox-extension-pack-Recognition-issue/idi-p/2695252</guid>
      <dc:creator>day_day_up</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-05T09:05:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add CI Type for Postgres Schema under Database Schema</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-CI-Type-for-Postgres-Schema-under-Database-Schema/idi-p/2695195</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are schema CI Types for:&amp;nbsp; DB2, IMS, MSSQL, MySQL, Oracle and SAP ASE, but none for Postgres.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 20:21:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-CI-Type-for-Postgres-Schema-under-Database-Schema/idi-p/2695195</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith_Paschal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-04T20:21:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Extracting License Key and version type of 3rd party SW</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Extracting-License-Key-and-version-type-of-3rd-party-SW/idi-p/2695062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For a 3rd party SW installed on machines, we need to know:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What is its &lt;STRONG&gt;License Key&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If it is a &lt;STRONG&gt;Trial&lt;/STRONG&gt; version&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will be helping us in improving our license compliance calculation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:09:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Extracting-License-Key-and-version-type-of-3rd-party-SW/idi-p/2695062</guid>
      <dc:creator>sarvesh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-04T07:09:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Job "AM Software Hypervisor Push, send all type of hypervisors as VMware ESX</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Job-quot-AM-Software-Hypervisor-Push-send-all-type-of/idi-p/2694697</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have uCMDB 10.33 and Asset Manager. We found that all types of hypervisors in uCMDB (for example "IBM Hypervisor" or "Microsoft Hypervisor", they are all pushed to AM as a Software Installation of "VMware ESX" by job AM software Hypervisor Push.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This causes a huge problem in the calculation of compliance for hypervisor licenses. It is a major bug and the job should be corrected to pass to Asset Manager the correct type for each hypervisor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:13:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Job-quot-AM-Software-Hypervisor-Push-send-all-type-of/idi-p/2694697</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kouramenos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-02T08:13:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discovery of the Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovery-of-the-Microsoft-Failover-Cluster-Virtual-Adapter/idi-p/2694415</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Microsoft Clusters uses 169.254.x.y IP adresses for it's virtual adapters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since the 169.254.x.y adresses are also used as Link-Local adresses we have applied a filter to exclude them from the dscovery.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But they are needed to properly represent the Microsoft Failover Clusters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The idea will be to enhance the MS Cluster discovery module to properly handle these virtual adapters even if the filter is applied.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The following document from Microsoft provides specific information for the MS Cluster Virtual Adapter:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/askcore/2009/02/13/what-is-a-microsoft-failover-cluster-virtual-adapter-anyway/" target="_blank"&gt;https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/askcore/2009/02/13/what-is-a-microsoft-failover-cluster-virtual-adapter-anyway/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Benoit&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:37:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovery-of-the-Microsoft-Failover-Cluster-Virtual-Adapter/idi-p/2694415</guid>
      <dc:creator>bnadon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-29T16:37:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UCMDB Job Performance Metrics Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/UCMDB-Job-Performance-Metrics-Tracking/idi-p/2694392</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Since I am going through some of the competitor products, idea comes to my mind like why don't we track each Job performance metrics in discovery Job level. So that customer can split their job and handle the job based on probe and manage. This will give more benefit to the customer to track each job and manage the discovery in effective way. I don't know how to build this functionality, but other competitor has this functionality at lease in analytics and reporting level.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:12:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/UCMDB-Job-Performance-Metrics-Tracking/idi-p/2694392</guid>
      <dc:creator>jagasubha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-29T15:12:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Synchronize logging between JMX-Console and log4j2_root.yaml</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Synchronize-logging-between-JMX-Console-and-log4j2-root-yaml/idi-p/2694219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I set, in the log4j2_root.yaml file:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;reconciliation.loglevel to DEBUG, then all files which use that appender are now in debug.&amp;nbsp; If I further go into the JMX-Console and set cmdb.reconciliation.log into 'INFO', that single appender is now in INFO logging.&amp;nbsp; It is not clear to a user why it is not in debug if it was changed from the JMX-Console.&amp;nbsp; Further, on reboot it will revert back to DEBUG specified in the .yaml file.&amp;nbsp; When log levels are changed in the JMX, they should reflect that change in the .yaml file in some way.&amp;nbsp; This will again mitigate confusion on how to know which log level is being used.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:53:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Synchronize-logging-between-JMX-Console-and-log4j2-root-yaml/idi-p/2694219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith_Paschal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-28T16:53:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improve logging support via JMX Console</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Improve-logging-support-via-JMX-Console/idi-p/2694218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently in the method on the JMX Console of:&amp;nbsp;loggersLevels, levels are listed such as:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;appilog.framework.server.grouping.ResourceGroupingManagerImpl&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is not intuitive to the user which logs will be put into a 'DEBUG' log level.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;The only way to map this is to go into the log4j2_root.yaml file and check what the AppenderRef is to give some idea of what logs will be set into debug, and then look up each entry where that appender is mentioned to reveal which specific logs are set into debug.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The change:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Add which logs the appender will modify in the JMX, or at the very least, write the AppenderRef if it exists for that appender.&amp;nbsp; This will mitigate SOME of the confusion.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:49:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Improve-logging-support-via-JMX-Console/idi-p/2694218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith_Paschal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-28T16:49:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discovering the InterfaceSpeed for AIX</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovering-the-InterfaceSpeed-for-AIX/idi-p/2693809</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Initially opened a ticket with MicroFocus to see why we were not getting the attribute &lt;EM&gt;InterfaceSpeed&lt;/EM&gt; populated in our UCMDB instances. With MicroFocus' help and the R&amp;amp;D team, we were able to get the &lt;EM&gt;InterfaceSpeed&lt;/EM&gt; populated for the CIs that we currently have discovered and what needs to be changed in order to gather this data for future discovery. Unfortunately for AIX discovery that proved more problematic and time-consuming for the R&amp;amp;D team and suggested that we enhance the AIX discovery to make it OOTB for future releases of the UCMDB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They suggested that I upload the following log to help with gathering the speed of the active network interface for AIX servers:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our LINUX/UNIX/AIX expert explained to me that we didn't find a way to get the Network interface speed from a single command output. Rather found that the NMON is able to send the monitoring sample to a spreadsheet readable file ( like CSV, comma separated file) so we can generate a script to get a couple of samples and grep from this file the data we required; something like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cd&amp;nbsp; /tmp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; export NMON=n&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- this indicates nmon to caught the network&amp;nbsp; sample&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; nmon&amp;nbsp; -c 2 -s 5 –f&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; - This generates the CVS file at /tmp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; root@labaix72a:/tmp&amp;gt; grep BBBN *.nmon&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; - it creates a file called &lt;EM&gt;ServerName_date_hour&lt;/EM&gt;.nmon as example on my server : labaix72a_190819_1503.nmon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BBBN,000,NetworkName,MTU,Mbits,Name&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BBBN,001,en0,1500,&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;10240&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;,Standard Ethernet Network Interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BBBN,002,en1,1500,&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;10240&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;,Standard Ethernet Network Interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BBBN,003,lo0,16896,0,Loopback Network Interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the data you are looking for , we can grep by en0, en1 instead of BBBN, I used BBBN because I found it is network related.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We need the attribute &lt;EM&gt;InterfaceSpeed&lt;/EM&gt; for our monitoring purposes. This was brought up to us by our Linux team for PDXC that they will need this in the near future for monitoring and although it wasn't mandatory for the initial discovery, they wanted to let us know that way we can look into getting this information and hopefully have it for later when they do need it for creating monitoring templates later for our customers' needs later on when they need it. The MicroFocus R&amp;amp;D team thought this log would be a great thing to post here to hopefully get added to the OOTB UCMDB for just in case someone, somewhere else runs into the same issue when discovering this particular data for AIX.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:16:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovering-the-InterfaceSpeed-for-AIX/idi-p/2693809</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaneB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T21:16:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UD licensing documantation is not concrete concerning the custom discoveries</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/UD-licensing-documantation-is-not-concrete-concerning-the-custom/idi-p/2693741</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The documentation about the license usage for custom UD adapters is not concrete. For example in this 11+ guide (&lt;A href="https://docs.microfocus.com/UCMDB/11.0/ucmdb-docs/docs/eng/doc_lib/Content/dfm/disc_c_licensing_ovw.htm" target="_self"&gt;https://docs.microfocus.com/UCMDB/11.0/ucmdb-docs/docs/eng/doc_lib/Content/dfm/disc_c_licensing_ovw.htm&lt;/A&gt;) we see: "Workstations will never consume an Advanced license” BUT in the table we see that only Advanced discovery includes 'Customized discovery' AND it’s not clear what will happen with the generic ‘Node’ with no enough attributes to determine if it’s a server or workstation. It makes it difficult to predict the license usage before releasing the adapter. This part should be more concrete, if there's always 1 unit per node or there are options - this should be clearly stated here. In general the guide should be more concrete.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 13:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/UD-licensing-documantation-is-not-concrete-concerning-the-custom/idi-p/2693741</guid>
      <dc:creator>d_shavrin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T13:43:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Machine learning discovery - UCMDB</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Machine-learning-discovery-UCMDB/idi-p/2693727</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Discovery powered by machine learning for mature software license recognition and teaching for advanced software asset management.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;#UCMDB&amp;nbsp; #MACHINE LEARNING&amp;nbsp; #AI&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:59:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Machine-learning-discovery-UCMDB/idi-p/2693727</guid>
      <dc:creator>shivakant Dubey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T12:59:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Possibility to use CC and BCC for sending reports</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Possibility-to-use-CC-and-BCC-for-sending-reports/idi-p/2693424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when scheduling reports or sending a report manually it's currently not possible to use the CC or BCC functionality, neither in CMDB nor in CMS UI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For privacy reasons and to be GDPR compliant (&lt;SPAN class="ILfuVd"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="e24Kjd"&gt;General Data Protection Regulation&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;) it should be possible to send mails to BCC recipients only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards&lt;BR /&gt;Konstantin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Possibility-to-use-CC-and-BCC-for-sending-reports/idi-p/2693424</guid>
      <dc:creator>Konstantin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-23T09:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add AWS Application Load Balancer (LB) as a Supported LB for High Availability</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-AWS-Application-Load-Balancer-LB-as-a-Supported-LB-for-High/idi-p/2693314</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As of Universal CMDB 2019.05 the only supported LB for High Availability (HA) mode is&amp;nbsp;F5 BIG-IP. This list should be expanded and with many applications moving to the cloud supporting AWS Application&amp;nbsp;LB has become more relevant. Also, while many customers feel comfortable translating the HA configuration instructions for&amp;nbsp;F5 BIG-IP into whatever LB they are using, AWS Application&amp;nbsp;LB tends to be less familiar&amp;nbsp;and customers going this path could use the added the support.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:13:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-AWS-Application-Load-Balancer-LB-as-a-Supported-LB-for-High/idi-p/2693314</guid>
      <dc:creator>Razumihin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-22T16:13:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow admins to set a limit capping total cloud discovery requests</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Allow-admins-to-set-a-limit-capping-total-cloud-discovery/idi-p/2692497</link>
      <description>&lt;P style="margin: 0in; margin-bottom: .0001pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif; color: black;"&gt;Certain cloud platform provider (e.g Azure) plans now incur costs per 1000 requests made. The ability to limit discovery such that it does not exceed X queries per month would be useful for cost control purposes and as a fail-safe mechanism.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Allow-admins-to-set-a-limit-capping-total-cloud-discovery/idi-p/2692497</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanieI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-19T09:22:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CMS Browser Policy - Save policy does not show where it is saved</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CMS-Browser-Policy-Save-policy-does-not-show-where-it-is-saved/idi-p/2692355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using UCMDB CMS 2019.02 Version. When I tried to create Policy and want to save the Policy. It is showing Policy is saved. But I could not find out where it is saved. Need to show the saved policy location in CMS UI.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CMS-Browser-Policy-Save-policy-does-not-show-where-it-is-saved/idi-p/2692355</guid>
      <dc:creator>jagasubha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-16T17:06:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CMS Browser Policy creation should need deletion policy option</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CMS-Browser-Policy-creation-should-need-deletion-policy-option/idi-p/2692351</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are using CMS 2019.02 Version. I am using CMS Browser for Policy Creation. I wrongly created policy and I want to delete the policy. Somehow I don't have the option to delete the policy. I don't want to handle this policy deletion at UCMDB. Since that is throwing Unrecognized error.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:03:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CMS-Browser-Policy-creation-should-need-deletion-policy-option/idi-p/2692351</guid>
      <dc:creator>jagasubha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-16T17:03:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CMS Browser Policy Creation does not have attribute OR Condition</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CMS-Browser-Policy-Creation-does-not-have-attribute-OR-Condition/idi-p/2692349</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am currently working on UCMDB CMS 2019.02 Version. I used the Policy in Query Designer of UCMDB. When I tried to create policy which accepts 5 attribute addition. But it does contain only - "AND" Condition. We need to add "OR" attribute condition which is totally missing the Key functionality.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/CMS-Browser-Policy-Creation-does-not-have-attribute-OR-Condition/idi-p/2692349</guid>
      <dc:creator>jagasubha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-16T16:59:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Possibility to use a custom icon for an OOTB CIT</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Possibility-to-use-a-custom-icon-for-an-OOTB-CIT/idi-p/2692201</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the forum are some discussions about &lt;A href="https://community.softwaregrp.com/t5/CMS-UCMDB-and-UD-User/UCMDB-Browser-HOW-TO-TIP-How-to-use-a-custom-icon-for-a-custom/m-p/1677558#M19195" target="_blank"&gt;“Use a custom icon for a custom CIT?&lt;/A&gt;“ &amp;nbsp;(e.g. &lt;A href="https://community.softwaregrp.com/t5/CMS-UCMDB-and-UD-User/UCMDB-Browser-HOW-TO-TIP-How-to-use-a-custom-icon-for-a-custom/m-p/1677558#M19195" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.softwaregrp.com/t5/CMS-UCMDB-and-UD-User/UCMDB-Browser-HOW-TO-TIP-How-to-use-a-custom-icon-for-a-custom/m-p/1677558#M19195&lt;/A&gt;) and also a “How-To” but this is&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;For custom CITs and we want to change the OOTB CITs&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;It is only described for the UCMDB Browser (an old version) and not for CMS UI&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This idea is similar to “Include a one-step-tool to create all required icons for custom CI types” (&lt;A href="https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Include-a-one-step-tool-to-create-all-required-icons-for-custom/idi-p/2688784" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Include-a-one-step-tool-to-create-all-required-icons-for-custom/idi-p/2688784&lt;/A&gt;) but this idea is about OOTB CITs and not only custom CITs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Such a How-To description (for admin UI, UCMDB Browser and CMS UI) should be added to the documentation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 06:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Possibility-to-use-a-custom-icon-for-an-OOTB-CIT/idi-p/2692201</guid>
      <dc:creator>MSchmitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-16T06:20:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enhance class model for IBM iSeries</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Enhance-class-model-for-IBM-iSeries/idi-p/2692198</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Customer wants to model IBM iSeries in UCMDB, so the starting point would be AS/400.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is a need to add new classifications of ISeries into UCMDB. The new CITs that need to be added are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;DS HMC&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;ISeries HMC&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;DD&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;LPAR&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Centera&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Data Domain&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Protectier&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;SAN&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 05:37:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Enhance-class-model-for-IBM-iSeries/idi-p/2692198</guid>
      <dc:creator>MSchmitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-16T05:37:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>kubectl authentication using Bearer Token Authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/kubectl-authentication-using-Bearer-Token-Authentication/idi-p/2692120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are trying to setup Kubernetes authentication and our security team is not very happy with the way it should be configured. It is very complicated process. It is very easy if bearer token authentication functionality is implemented in uCMDB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ServiceNow has similar authentication functionality already implemented.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.servicenow.com/bundle/store-it-operations-management/page/product/itom/concept/kubernetes-discovery.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://docs.servicenow.com/bundle/store-it-operations-management/page/product/itom/concept/kubernetes-discovery.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can also get some details from Kubernetes documents.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/authentication/#authentication-strategies" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/authentication/#authentication-strategies&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Madhava&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 15:55:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/kubectl-authentication-using-Bearer-Token-Authentication/idi-p/2692120</guid>
      <dc:creator>madhavaks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-15T15:55:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Create documentation to compare the features between CMS-UI Query Designer and CM (UCMDB)</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Create-documentation-to-compare-the-features-between-CMS-UI/idi-p/2692110</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would like to submit a request to create some documentation comparing the Policy Management features of the new CMS-UI Query Designer vs Configuration Manager (CM). As of 2019.05, UCMDB does not include CM in the installation and has been replaced by the CMS-UI Query Designer. I am curious if there are any major feature differences between the two components.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"This release of Configuration Management System does not include a new release for UCMDB Configuration Manager (CM), and it does not support CM version 2018.11 or any earlier version. For policy-related feature, you can leverage the new Policy Management capability introduced in the Query Designer module of CMS UI."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Source:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://docs.microfocus.com/itom/Universal_CMDB:2019.05/SysReqsSwCoexist#Content_Pack_Support_Matrix" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.microfocus.com/itom/Universal_CMDB:2019.05/SysReqsSwCoexist#Content_Pack_Support_Matrix&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Create-documentation-to-compare-the-features-between-CMS-UI/idi-p/2692110</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshPotz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-15T14:58:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Document which provides information about different attributes discovered by different discovery job</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Document-which-provides-information-about-different-attributes/idi-p/2691301</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently we are looking for document which provides information about different attributes discovered and populated by different discovery jobs as customers requirement was to populate all attributes in Node CI type property.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This document will be helpful in deciding specific discovery jobs so as to populate all attributes of a CI type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can you please include this information in product documents.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sridhara.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Document-which-provides-information-about-different-attributes/idi-p/2691301</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sridhara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-12T11:01:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>uCMDB to display Related CIs/Topology Dynamically</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/uCMDB-to-display-Related-CIs-Topology-Dynamically/idi-p/2691079</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are looking at displaying topology dynamically without having to click "Get Related CIs".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Consider NNMi Layer 2 topology graph as an example.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Select a CI, all its relations (not just the first level) must be displayed instantly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NOTE: We tried perspective view, but it's not possible to have a single query that works for all CI types.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Praveena&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 06:50:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/uCMDB-to-display-Related-CIs-Topology-Dynamically/idi-p/2691079</guid>
      <dc:creator>PraveenaC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-09T06:50:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AWS discovery enhancement to include EKS Discovery</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/AWS-discovery-enhancement-to-include-EKS-Discovery/idi-p/2690346</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are currently using AWS Webservices discovery to discover CI's from AWS cloud. We found that currently EKS discovery is not supported as part of AWS webservices discovery. This is very critical functionality, which will greatly help us to discover all containers. So please implement this at the earliest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Madhava&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 16:55:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/AWS-discovery-enhancement-to-include-EKS-Discovery/idi-p/2690346</guid>
      <dc:creator>madhavaks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-05T16:55:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Docker Discovery for Windows</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Docker-Discovery-for-Windows/idi-p/2690083</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The current Docker Discovery by Shell only works for Unix, but we have Docker for Windows as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as I can see Docker for Windows would need to use the same Docker commands as the Unix instances, so extending the capability to cover Windows should not be too difficult.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 09:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Docker-Discovery-for-Windows/idi-p/2690083</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichardS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-02T09:37:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Make Oracle LMS reports visible from the CMS UI</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Make-Oracle-LMS-reports-visible-from-the-CMS-UI/idi-p/2689955</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Oracle LMS reports is part of custom reports which are not visible in the CMS UI. Now that the Oracle LMS discovery is provided OOTB in the new CMS releases, it is largely distributed and the customers have started to ask for such functionality.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One should be able&amp;nbsp;to set permissions to access such custom reports like for topology reports.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:31:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Make-Oracle-LMS-reports-visible-from-the-CMS-UI/idi-p/2689955</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nathalie Niderkorn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-01T16:31:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ability to change UCMDB Browser icons based on attribute value</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-change-UCMDB-Browser-icons-based-on-attribute-value/idi-p/2689906</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the Admin client, we have the ability to change the icon of a CI based on the value of an attribute.&amp;nbsp; This works great in that client, but when you go to the UCMDB Browser, that icon has not been changed.&amp;nbsp; Example:&amp;nbsp; Icon for the Unix server is changed when the value of an attribute changes.&amp;nbsp; The different icon appears in the Admin client, but in the UCMDB Browser, it continues to be the standard icon for the Unix server.&amp;nbsp; How do we get the different icon to appear in the UCMDB Browser as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-change-UCMDB-Browser-icons-based-on-attribute-value/idi-p/2689906</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gregory Pappas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-01T12:41:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Create support for running the UCMDB Local Client on Linux OS</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Create-support-for-running-the-UCMDB-Local-Client-on-Linux-OS/idi-p/2689739</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My customer only supports Linux in their IT infrastructure and they require the need to access the RTSM for OBM. Micro Focus documentation suggests that the UCMDB Local Client is not support on the Linux OS server. Can there be steps made to create support for running the UCMDB Local Client on Linux OS?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Kia&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Create-support-for-running-the-UCMDB-Local-Client-on-Linux-OS/idi-p/2689739</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kia_Saunders</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T15:36:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add a field on the TQL Properties page</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-a-field-on-the-TQL-Properties-page/idi-p/2689734</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Add a field on the TQL properties page to hold the created by userid of the developer.&amp;nbsp; If Micro Focus delivered, then user a default OOTB value.&amp;nbsp; If it is a user-created TQL, then capture the logged in user's name in the field.&amp;nbsp; The field would need to be captured on the underlying XML so it is included when packaged and deployed in other environments. The purpose of this would be to enable system administrators to train and coach developers in writing efficient and effective TQLs. At present, there is nothing in the TQL properties that indicates who wrote the TQL.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:26:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-a-field-on-the-TQL-Properties-page/idi-p/2689734</guid>
      <dc:creator>W_Harg_53</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T15:26:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VMware discovery of Datastore Clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/VMware-discovery-of-Datastore-Clusters/idi-p/2689569</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VMware Datastore Clusters are entities containing one or multiple datastores. They are very important as clients are using them in build and provisioning processes together with other ITIL processes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we want to be competitive on te market we need to introduce this new CIT with dependencies similar to those of VMware Datastore with additional relationship to VMware Datastore.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:06:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/VMware-discovery-of-Datastore-Clusters/idi-p/2689569</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bozidar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T08:06:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More granular permissions for UCMDB SDK in non-MT environment</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/More-granular-permissions-for-UCMDB-SDK-in-non-MT-environment/idi-p/2689380</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently, in a non-Multi-Tenant environment, a user can only have the permission "Access to SDK" or not. Once it has this permission,&amp;nbsp;the user can execute any API method provided by any API (REST, Java, SOAP). Then, the user can read and write all data. CIs can be&amp;nbsp;deleted updated, read etc. The user can also execute every TQL in the system.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please note that in a Multi-Tenant environment this scenario is not valid, users need "Access to SDK" and "CI Data Update" to be able to create/update/delete CIs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So the same functionality for a non-MT environment is needed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Env: UCMDB 10.33&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Reference:&amp;nbsp;QCCR1H112334 Allow detailed permissions for UCMDB API (e.g. read-only) in non-MT environment&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/More-granular-permissions-for-UCMDB-SDK-in-non-MT-environment/idi-p/2689380</guid>
      <dc:creator>MSchmitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-30T10:42:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Add Authentication Algorithm MD6/7/8/9/10 and SHA1 option in SNMP Protocol for version 2018.11</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-Authentication-Algorithm-MD6-7-8-9-10-and-SHA1-option-in/idi-p/2689097</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When we try to configure Network devices with Authentication Algorithm&amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT&gt;MD6/7/8/9/10 and SHA1,&lt;/FONT&gt; we observed that these algorithms are not mentioned in the drop down for SNMP Protocol credential. uCMDB version is 2018.11&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:30:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Add-Authentication-Algorithm-MD6-7-8-9-10-and-SHA1-option-in/idi-p/2689097</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nikita D</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-29T12:30:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Issue while add the IP range From Management Zone</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Issue-while-add-the-IP-range-From-Management-Zone/idi-p/2688997</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our Customer is using UCMDB 11.0 and have raised an issue where UCMDB is allowing to add the IP ranges via Management Zone. We have opened a support case SD02513002&amp;nbsp;but Product Support has pointed us to the Idea Exchange.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here are the steps to replicate the Problem - While creating a new Management Zone. Click New -&amp;gt; Specify Management zone name -&amp;gt; Define Partial Ranges on Domain -&amp;gt; Click * To add new range in management Zone (Give some IP which is not defined in probe range) &amp;amp; Save.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;System is allowing to save&amp;nbsp;the Range&amp;nbsp;even if IPs are&amp;nbsp;not added on probes.. Customer&amp;nbsp;is requesting us &amp;nbsp;to give us a warning pop up that this IP is not available in Probe so that they can take the corrective action.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As per Support, it is a product feature but customer has asked us a question Why Product is allowing us to add those IP ranges which are not available in Probes, if there is no way to track them. This is what our documentation states - " When running a zone-based discovery, the system dynamically dispatches discovery jobs to live IP addresses only in the IP ranges defined for management zones. During the dispatch, domain-based IP ranges will be converted to probe-based IP ranges, and invalid IP addresses will be skipped."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, how the customer will come to know if by mistake they forgot to add some of the ranges in Probe &amp;amp; later adding it directly in Management Zone. Customer Expectation is to get a hot Fix for this issue. Can anyone from Product be able to help us in getting the Fix?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Atul Gupta&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Atul Gupta&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 05:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Issue-while-add-the-IP-range-From-Management-Zone/idi-p/2688997</guid>
      <dc:creator>atulgupta72</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-29T05:51:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deliver a standard enrichment which links Windows Services to their processes</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Deliver-a-standard-enrichment-which-links-Windows-Services-to/idi-p/2688814</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Customer suggested that Micro Focus includes a new Enrichment into the product which automatically links the discovered Windows Services of each machine with the corresponding process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This enrichment could be turned off by default.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Uli&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:34:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Deliver-a-standard-enrichment-which-links-Windows-Services-to/idi-p/2688814</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uli Manschke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-26T12:34:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deliver a distributable package for UCMDB Local Client</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Deliver-a-distributable-package-for-UCMDB-Local-Client/idi-p/2688785</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;UCMDB Local client should also be available as a pre-packaged MSI file or similar format.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some customers require creation of redistributable packages even for smaller number of installations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:42:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Deliver-a-distributable-package-for-UCMDB-Local-Client/idi-p/2688785</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uli Manschke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-26T09:42:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Include a one-step-tool to create all required icons for custom CI types</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Include-a-one-step-tool-to-create-all-required-icons-for-custom/idi-p/2688784</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Custom CI types can have their own icons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To enable correct display of such icons in Java UI, UCMDB Browser and CMS UI, one has to create (at least) five different icon files in three formats and in multiple locations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is not very user friendly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The request is to enhance the UCMDB installation with a tool which allows to design a new icon and which then creates e.g. a package or a filesystem structure to load such icons into the correct locations with the correct names.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:37:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Include-a-one-step-tool-to-create-all-required-icons-for-custom/idi-p/2688784</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uli Manschke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-26T09:37:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>discover blade servers and enclosures and their relationship</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/discover-blade-servers-and-enclosures-and-their-relationship/idi-p/2688672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Requirement&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Discovery of Blade server, Blade Enclosure, Chassis, Rack and relationship between Blade and Blade Enclosure, Blade Enclosure and Rack etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This requirement is prevalent from quite sometime, where lot of customers are asking for inventory and topology information of Blade and Blade Enclosure etc.&amp;nbsp;But so far we have not seen much progress on this requirement HP/HPE/MF uCMDB product.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the contrary, BMC ADDM has already implemented Blade, Blade Enclosure discovery long ago. Refer attached links for details:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://communities.bmc.com/community/bmcdn/discovery/blog/2015/06/03/announcing-the-availability-of-addm-102" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.bmc.com/community/bmcdn/discovery/blog/2015/06/03/announcing-the-availability-of-addm-102&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://communities.bmc.com/thread/146219?start=0&amp;amp;tstart=0" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.bmc.com/thread/146219?start=0&amp;amp;tstart=0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore Blade and Blade Enclosure inventory and topology discovery package in MF uCMDB can be designed and developed on the similar lines.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since lots of these blades are used as ESXi servers in VMware Vcenter application, therefore Blades are already getting discovered with proper serial number in VMware Vcenter topology job. All we need is to discover the Blade Enclosure using SNMP or SSH.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For instance, If MF uCMDB is able populate the inventory from Dell Chassis Management Controller(CMC), then MF uCMDB can also be designed to relate already discovered Blades (used as ESXi server) with Blade Enclosures.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dell CMC already captures the inventory of Blades and Blades Enclosure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.dell.com/support/article/in/en/indhs1/sln311283/dell-chassis-management-controller-cmc?lang=en" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.dell.com/support/article/in/en/indhs1/sln311283/dell-chassis-management-controller-cmc?lang=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rohit Sobhani&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:57:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/discover-blade-servers-and-enclosures-and-their-relationship/idi-p/2688672</guid>
      <dc:creator>RohitSS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-25T14:57:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regular expressions in TQL attribute conditions and view/reports</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Regular-expressions-in-TQL-attribute-conditions-and-view-reports/idi-p/2688264</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would like to be able to use regular expressions in TQL and view/reports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In TQL, currently, only Like (%) operators are allowed but this it too limited when trying to match complex patterns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In reports/views, I would like to be able to parse a string attribute and extract some part of it into a column.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In some features of the CMS, like in enrichment rules, we can already use regular expression in order to extract part of a string or filter which CI will match or not. It would be nice to extend the use of regex to other features where filters and data parsing is available.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Regular-expressions-in-TQL-attribute-conditions-and-view-reports/idi-p/2688264</guid>
      <dc:creator>ViauJoc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-23T17:39:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Permission for creating enrichment rules without being a full uCMDB administrator</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Permission-for-creating-enrichment-rules-without-being-a-full/idi-p/2688257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As a power user of uCMDB and working with a lot of CIs, I would like to be able to create enrichment rules by myself. Currently (v2019.02), I would need to be a full uCMDB administrator to do that and, understandably,&amp;nbsp; my organization does not want to grant me the right to alter the whole uCMDB configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, please, make an independent right for managing enrichment rules, separated from the full admin right. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:13:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Permission-for-creating-enrichment-rules-without-being-a-full/idi-p/2688257</guid>
      <dc:creator>ViauJoc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-23T17:13:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Please provide a 64-Bit UD Agent for macOS</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Please-provide-a-64-Bit-UD-Agent-for-macOS/idi-p/2688239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;macOS is stopping support of 64-bit applications.&amp;nbsp; The current Universal Discovery agent results in a macOS Systems Pop-Up warning that it is a 32-bit application, and this is causing confusion for users since the agent is a background program they are not familiar with.&amp;nbsp; Can you please provide a 64-bit version?&amp;nbsp; Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Please-provide-a-64-Bit-UD-Agent-for-macOS/idi-p/2688239</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeJoe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-23T15:58:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rollback CI instance from history or snapshot.</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Rollback-CI-instance-from-history-or-snapshot/idi-p/2688082</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to add a function to rollback CI instances to a specified time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 02:20:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Rollback-CI-instance-from-history-or-snapshot/idi-p/2688082</guid>
      <dc:creator>stingcai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-23T02:20:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upgrade SNMP4.jar automaticly during upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Upgrade-SNMP4-jar-automaticly-during-upgrade/idi-p/2687719</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I upgraded from UCMDB 10.33 CUP1 CUP25 to UCMDB 10.33 CUP4 CP2019.05, and we started to have error with snmp discovery.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally i found the fix on a forum, but the upgrade should have done that automaticly :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-UCMDB-and-UD-User/lt-UCMDB-Support-Tip-gt-Manually-upgrade-the-SNMP4J-library-to/td-p/1658058" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-UCMDB-and-UD-User/lt-UCMDB-Support-Tip-gt-Manually-upgrade-the-SNMP4J-library-to/td-p/1658058&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It upgrade that jar and 2 java files.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 17:51:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Upgrade-SNMP4-jar-automaticly-during-upgrade/idi-p/2687719</guid>
      <dc:creator>froypaul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-19T17:51:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Relationship of UDA CIs just like other running software</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Relationship-of-UDA-CIs-just-like-other-running-software/idi-p/2687529</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When a running software is created in uCMDB using UD discovery, there are common relationships created along with it: IPAddressEndpoint, Process, Node, ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when a UDA CI is created (UDA is a subtype of running software), there are no relationships with its process nor IPAdressEndpoint despite the fact that those two objects do exists and are already in relationship with the Node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, UDA is kind of not compliant with the usual topology of the running softwares. Please make sure that UDA, at least, follows the same topology as the other running softwares.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:52:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Relationship-of-UDA-CIs-just-like-other-running-software/idi-p/2687529</guid>
      <dc:creator>ViauJoc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-18T18:52:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discovery using Screen Scraping</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovery-using-Screen-Scraping/idi-p/2687332</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can discover a little bit of information about things like ILO Cards, Printers and other devices by looking at the management web pages that they display.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Given suitable regex and attribute destinations UCMDB could harvest that data without requiring credentials.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This takes you from: this IP responds, but we don't know what is on the end of it to: this IP belongs to a Dell Integrated Remote Access Controller 7. Not a vast information, but a lot better than what you started with.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 06:40:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovery-using-Screen-Scraping/idi-p/2687332</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichardS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-18T06:40:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Probe filter mechanism design gap - related CIs must not be filtered if relevant for reconciliation</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Probe-filter-mechanism-design-gap-related-CIs-must-not-be/idi-p/2686904</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the current probe filter mechanism does not send CIs to UCMDB if there was no change on the CI compared to last discovery run. whereas this can be good for performance, it is very problematic if those filtered CIs are needed to identify other CIs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;here 2 examples:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Location CIs: a location is identified by its name and also related location CIs, e.g. a room location requires the parent floor location CI to be uniquely identified. if there was a change on the room CI but not on the floor CI, only the room CI will be send to UCMDB which is not enough to reconcile it&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;SAP System CIs: a sap system CI is identified by its related sap application server CIs. if only the sap system was changed and send to UCMDB, it is not enough to reconcile without the related sap app servers&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;consequently, before the probe filters a CI, it needs to be checked if this CI is required to identify any other CI from the bulk&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:18:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Probe-filter-mechanism-design-gap-related-CIs-must-not-be/idi-p/2686904</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Engelmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-16T13:18:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discovery pattern for BigIQ</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovery-pattern-for-BigIQ/idi-p/2686899</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'd like to suggest creation of a dscovery pattern for BigIQ. It would provide&amp;nbsp; a simpler and safer discovery of F5/BigIP in large environments, in stead of&amp;nbsp;doing each and everyone with eg. SNMP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:57:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Discovery-pattern-for-BigIQ/idi-p/2686899</guid>
      <dc:creator>Henrik Ewaldsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-16T12:57:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow multiple users to modify probe configuration concurrently - append without overwrite</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Allow-multiple-users-to-modify-probe-configuration-concurrently/idi-p/2686610</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When multiple users concurrently modify probe configuration (e.g to add IP ranges for discovery), they overwrite each other's changes. Requesting the ability for users to make concurrent updates which append without conflict.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Available workarounds such as periodically importing a merged excel file pose security and usability challenges.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Allow-multiple-users-to-modify-probe-configuration-concurrently/idi-p/2686610</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanieI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-15T11:05:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SD02488548 Could I paste Assigned tag description into one of UCMDB attribute ?</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/SD02488548-Could-I-paste-Assigned-tag-description-into-one-of/idi-p/2686142</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are using UCMDB 2019.05 we connected our UCMDB to MS SQL 2014 Enterprise edition. I am asking that customer has some data and information on vCenter(assigned tags, custom attributes, and notes.) I discovered vmware esx servers and vcenter-esx-computer topology thanks to virtualization by VIM jobs. Customer wants to see assigned tags(servers' responsible departments) in vCenter also in UCMDB. How can I do that ? There is an attribute name which is "Tags" in UCMDB. There should be solution copy vcenter values into UCMDB tags attribute or another attribute. If we managed to paste data I will create an attribute which is "Responsible department" and I will do enrichment rule between "Responsible department" and "Tags" or another attribute has been copied by vCenter. I uploaded clear png files as attachments.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note : Waiting for creating an Enhancement Request(ER).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:41:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/SD02488548-Could-I-paste-Assigned-tag-description-into-one-of/idi-p/2686142</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tugrul Basak_91</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-11T08:41:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adding support of .NET Framework versions for PowerShellConnector.exe</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Adding-support-of-NET-Framework-versions-for-PowerShellConnector/idi-p/2686141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When a "PowerShell" Job is executed, Probe creates a new Process and starts the "powershellconnector.exe". The "exe" was compiled with .NET Framework 3.5 and it depend on it to run. When the Framework is disabled, the "exe" can't be loaded and Process exit with error code. Then Probe can't connect to it. So the job failed in Probe.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Could we include support for newer version of .NET Framework for the "powershellconnector.exe" ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:41:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Adding-support-of-NET-Framework-versions-for-PowerShellConnector/idi-p/2686141</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stanislav Gegov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-11T08:41:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Support for Neo4J DB Type</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Support-for-Neo4J-DB-Type/idi-p/2685808</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will be really great if ucmdb starts supporting&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: inherit;"&gt;Neo4J&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Graphical&amp;nbsp;Database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;More information about this can be seen on -&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://neo4j.com/" target="_blank"&gt;https://neo4j.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Case id for reference&amp;nbsp;SD02494502&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:23:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Support-for-Neo4J-DB-Type/idi-p/2685808</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sbagde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-09T16:23:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Population of VMware storage topology (mapping between Drive C: -&gt; VMware Datastore)</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Population-of-VMware-storage-topology-mapping-between-Drive-C-gt/idi-p/2685309</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We would like to see population of VMware storage topology that will include population of mapping between Drive C: down to VMware datastore.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The change should most probably touch both VMware Topology by VIM as well as Resources by Shell/WMI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dmitry&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 14:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Population-of-VMware-storage-topology-mapping-between-Drive-C-gt/idi-p/2685309</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dima Gomel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-05T14:06:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Integrate SAML SSO of CMS 2018.08 “classic” with SMAX 2019.05 IDM</title>
      <link>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Integrate-SAML-SSO-of-CMS-2018-08-classic-with-SMAX-2019-05-IDM/idi-p/2684804</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Customer need to integrate SAML SSO of CMS 2018.08 “classic” with SMAX 2019.05 IDM.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Internal CMS of&amp;nbsp;SMA-X&amp;nbsp;can integrate with the internal IDM of SMA-X, but not classic CMS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Request:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Create a document or modify products to permit “classic UCMDB” to support SAML SSO integration with SMAX 2019.05 IDM service.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;See QCIM1H126267&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 14:48:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.microfocus.com/t5/CMS-Idea-Exchange/Integrate-SAML-SSO-of-CMS-2018-08-classic-with-SMAX-2019-05-IDM/idi-p/2684804</guid>
      <dc:creator>Davide Dargenio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-02T14:48:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

