Verified Answers

If an answer to your question is correct, click on "Verify Answer" under the "More" button. The answer will now appear with a checkmark. Please be sure to always mark answers that resolve your issue as verified. Your fellow Community members will appreciate it! Learn more

  • State Not Answered
  • Replies replies
    2
  • Subscribers subscribers
    2
  • Views views
    764
  • Users 0 members are here
  • Locked Locked
Related
Options
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

ZAM compliance report grouped by site/department/cost center

MigrationDeletedUser
We have a customer who wants to manage his licenses separately between multipe organizational units within the company.

In the compliance report the customer wants to see the installation counts for the different organizational units.

In earlier version of ZAM (for sure in ZAM 7.5) the compliance report could be grouped by site/departmen/cost center. In ZAM 11.4 and ZAM 2017, we can only differentiate regarding purchase records, however the number of discovered products cannot be split into numbers by OU's.

Their current use case in practice:
They moved 100 machines into Cost Center1 and 200 machines into Cost Center2.

They would like to see a report that Cost Center 1 uses x number of licenses and Cost Center2 uses y number of licenses.

How can we achieve that with ZAM?

Thanks,
Gergely Turcsik
  • 0
    I think at present one would have to re-develop some variant of the compliance report in Jaspersoft Studio. Not a simple proposition. In the mean time I'd add your posting to the ideas system so that it's in front of Product Management and we can get it scheduled. Going forward, if there's ever going to be support fo rmulti-tenancy, we'd need to have a report along these lines.
  • 0 in reply to 
    BMcDowell;2461659 wrote:
    I think at present one would have to re-develop some variant of the compliance report in Jaspersoft Studio. Not a simple proposition. In the mean time I'd add your posting to the ideas system so that it's in front of Product Management and we can get it scheduled. Going forward, if there's ever going to be support fo rmulti-tenancy, we'd need to have a report along these lines.


    Hi Bruce,

    Please add the post to the ideas for a future report.

    Thank you.

    Regards

Resources

Support
Documentation
Learning Services
Partner Programs
Privacy
Compliance
Help
Company
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Cookies Preferences
Accessibility
Anti-Slavery Statement
Support
Contact Us
Careers
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of OpenText. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.), Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, or Micro Focus. As of January 31, 2023, the Material is now offered by OpenText, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP, Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE, and Micro Focus marks is historical in nature and the HP, Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE, and Micro Focus marks are the property of their respective owners.