Boss: I was chatting to the sales rat from (insert competitor here) and product (insert competitive solution) can do everything I've ever wanted. Why are we still using that Novell ZEN thingy?
You: Well ZENworks is providing us with great value and meeting our needs. I'm sure that we can do just as much, if not more, than that other solution
Boss: Prove it
And there lies the problem. We all know that ZENworks has a ton of features that provide value to our working lives. Not having to run around installing software, being able to support our users remotely, deploying operating systems, helping with software licensing to name but a few. The question is how do we go about showing this to the rest of the business in order to protect our time, skills and experience invested in ZENworks.
Over the next few posts, I'm going to be looking at ways we can go about doing this and I'd love to get feedback from you all on what you need, rather than what I think you need.
Still nothing but commentary, no analysis no white paper, no metrics. I can hand the boss white papers outlining the exact cost of operations per seat for MSCCM 2007, ZDM has no such white paper thus far? Just commentary.
Not sure if I recognize arrogance in my blog nor the fact that I have stated that X is better than ZCM and expected people to take my word. Indeed I've offered a 3rd party perspective on SCCM for example.
You mentioned comparisons. This is what I'm trying to figure out what people are looking for.
Do you really want a feature by feature account of ZCM vs the opposition ? Would you find some thought leadership on the Novell system management vision better ? Or a blend of the two ?
Help me out here to avoid giving this audience something they didn't want and can't use.
Blartfast what is needed in sysadmin community is less arrogance and more substance. Just b/c you say it is won't appeal to the executive.
What is needed from marketing is marketing, great comparison info on all products. The sysadmin time would better used if the company that wants to sell the product gives all the info needed and located in one area.
A comparative analysis of Novel's ZCM against Microsoft's desktop solution SCCM2007 is difficult to find on the internet. I've looked and have seen a few references to the functionality of SCCM2007 in various publications but no indepth study of Microsoft's new desktop management system. The complexity of implementing Microsoft's new product,SCCM2007, discourages a 'casual review' by interested parties.
What I'm looking for are 'hard differences' that come to the surface in the context of using the products. The fact that SCCM2007 can only see/manage objects in Active Directory is a 'short term' advantage for Zenworks during the migration periond from eDir to AD. But after that, where is the compelling logic to keep a novell solution in an exclusively AD environment.
Hopefully Novell has an implementation of SCCM2007 and has this new microsoft product under a microscope.
I'd leave ZENworks to manage your windows estate and spend $499 on the unlimited desktop management from Apple. It's going to be a lot cheaper than using Altiris which will not have the range of features for Apple and you having to repeat all of the work you have done for imaging machines.
that sounds like a good reason to stay with ZENworks.
but don't take my word for it
When eweek looked at sccm in april 2007, they said
"deployment procedures are still complex and fragile."
they recommened deploying SCCM to the IT staff to work out inventory collection quirks.
"Many of the Microsoft management platform’s improved (inventory) and new (task sequencing) features have a significant learning curve"
and finally ( although there is much more )
" That said, we couldn’t shake the feeling that with SCCM 2007—as well as with versions of SMS going back to the late 1990s—Microsoft is just dabbling in IT management, taking only those steps necessary to keep up with the competition."
Remember that Microsoft makes the bulk of its money from OS and Office; that's is where it has the focus, not on systems management.