Idea ID: 2829876

Voting, Expected Behavior and Supported functionalities thoughts

Status : New Idea

We're not to hot about the voting process and the way it's implemented.

It seems that it's a mixed blessing. Voting to add some new functionalities, and we men "new", might be appropriate, but having to vote so past versions functionalities are implemented in newer versions seems odd to us.

There's a great diversity in types of users and the way their business is run, the one to one vote might be good for democracy, but certainly skewed for business processes and weight.

Large corps with infrastructure that includes servers that fit their needs but are not as "mainstream" as Windows Servers for example, still need to have a toll (HPSA, DMA, etc) that support all their environment.

Having to add different tools because support in new versions is postponed for lack of votes would  lead to switch relationship.




Server Automation
  • Data Classification: [-Internal-]

    Hi Cosmin,

    Yes you can call me 

    Pierre Samson

    Pierre B. Samson
    IT Distinguished Technologist
    Operations Automation & Integration
    BB&T Process Master
    Assistant Vice-President

  • We thank you for being a loyal customer and for your continued contributions to the DCA and SA community forums.

    I am sorry to hear that you are not satisfied with the Idea Exchange process. Would you be available for a call with me to discuss your concerns? I would like to hear your feedback and see how to best address the situation.

    -Cosmin Rus