ucmdb 10.01: Federation Performance/Best practice
I am worried about performance and looking for guidance how best to federate.
currently we are looking at a db with 2 million records of interest and trying to sort out if to use a federation adapter or some intermediate mechanism to support faster queries.
Federation has a query that traverses at least two tables on the remote db.
I am wondering if anyone has looked at
1. Creating a table that are normalized specifically for ucmdb queries.
2. Create a cache ucmdb instance just to handle data, then enrich and have ucmdb run federation against this - caching ucmdb server.
Any federation guidnace would be appreciated.
FYI, this is specifically for IBM TADZ federation so if anyone has specific federation recommendation I would like to hear them.
Re: ucmdb 10.01: Federation Performance/Best practice
I am currently working on finding out more information about your questions. I will come back to you as soon as I can.
If you find that this or any post resolves your issue, please be sure to mark it as an accepted solution.”
Click the KUDOS star on the left to say 'Thanks'