Super Contributor.. Super Contributor..
Super Contributor..

ucmdb 10.01: Federation Performance/Best practice

I am worried about performance and looking for guidance how best to federate.


currently we are looking at a db with 2 million records of  interest and trying to sort out if to use a federation adapter or some intermediate mechanism to support faster queries.


Federation has a query that traverses at least two tables on the  remote db.


I am wondering if anyone has looked at


1. Creating a table that are normalized specifically for ucmdb queries.

2. Create a cache ucmdb instance just to handle data, then enrich and have ucmdb run federation against this - caching ucmdb server.


Any federation guidnace would be appreciated.


FYI, this is specifically for IBM TADZ federation so if anyone has specific federation recommendation I would like to hear them.


Thank you.



Labels (1)
1 Reply
Micro Focus Frequent Contributor
Micro Focus Frequent Contributor

Re: ucmdb 10.01: Federation Performance/Best practice



I am currently working on finding out more information about your questions. I will come back to you as soon as I can.




“HP Support
If you find that this or any post resolves your issue, please be sure to mark it as an accepted solution.”

Click the KUDOS star on the left to say 'Thanks'
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Micro Focus. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. As of September 1, 2017, the Material is now offered by Micro Focus, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks is historical in nature, and the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks are the property of their respective owners.