Amending mechanism of Result Management

Idea ID 2759649

Amending mechanism of Result Management

We are in need of amending mechanism of Result Management. Currently it is implemented in the adapter level which causes much trouble so we would suggest it to be moved to job level functionality.

 

Why would it be helpful?

Let’s say we have an Integration Point with two jobs, in the first job we receive Node + IP and in the second job we get only Node.

 

What is expected:

We  would suggest changing Auto Deletion so that Node would be deleted only in a condition of original Node has been deleted so it would be deleted with second job only meanwhile we would like to remove IP in the first job.

 

Currently it is impossible to proceed with it as first job will delete Node if it has no IP address.

 

There is workaround of creating an adapter for each job, but it makes administering much harder and it consumes licenses. 

 

We expect a lot of UCMDB – UCMDB integrations in our landscapeand this case can be seen every time. We believe it will be helpful for all customers having UCMDB – UCMDB integrations.

.

8 Comments
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Thank you for sharing your idea! It’s open for comments and kudos, and we’re looking forward to input from the community. Once there is enough community traction, it will be further reviewed by the product team
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Status changed to: Waiting for Votes
 
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Thank you for sharing your idea! It’s open for comments and kudos, and we’re looking forward to input from the community. Once there is enough community traction, it will be further reviewed by the product team
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Status changed to: Waiting for Votes
 
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Thank you for sharing your idea! It’s open for comments and kudos, and we’re looking forward to input from the community. Once there is enough community traction, it will be further reviewed by the product team
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Status changed to: Waiting for Votes
 
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Thank you for sharing your idea! It’s open for comments and kudos, and we’re looking forward to input from the community. Once there is enough community traction, it will be further reviewed by the product team
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Status changed to: Waiting for Votes
 
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Micro Focus. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. As of September 1, 2017, the Material is now offered by Micro Focus, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks is historical in nature, and the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks are the property of their respective owners.