

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Parsing error with WebInspect 20.2.0 test license file
Hi!
I'm having troubles activating a test license for Webinspect 20.2.0.
I have generated the request license file with the token sent by a person from Microfocus, went to https://licenseservice.fortify.hpe.com/OfflineLicensing.aspx and generated the response license file successfully.
The problem here is that, when I try to perform the activation with the response file, I get an error: "License file failed to be parsed".
I think that the problem is in the client data. The token is generated for a person with some non-UTF8 characters in the name, and in the response license file, these characters are shown like '?' character. For example:
<LastName>P?rez Rodr?guez</LastName>
How can I solve this?
Thanks in advance.
BR,
Carlos.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
At this time the only way to resolve this is to not include those characters. The product management team is aware of this.


- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi, ebell.
Thank you very much for your answer.
Then, it's necessary to generate a new license Token changing the customer data, without any character of this kind, isn't it?
I tried to modify the response license xml in order to not include these characters, but it didn't work. I guess that the original file downloaded from the offline license url must not be modified, since it has some checksum system (sha1 cypher, I think). Am I right?
Thanks in advance.
BR,
Carlos.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
That is correct. Those characters will need to be removed from the registration information before the request file is created. Modifying the response will not work as you've discovered.