Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.
2129 views

Folder Confusion

Hi,

I'm still with my archiving application (see some posts before). Now
I've got a new problem:

I scan the mailboxes for new Items using SOAP (the read cursor calls,
with retention TS). Because I have to send the items with SMTP to the
archiving box (it's an appliance called EMA), I fetch the mails etc.
using IMAP, then they come in the right format and I only have to
forward them. Now the problem:

When everything is (and was) English, there are no problems with
foldernames etc, except that the / (root folder) in SOAP is dispayed in
Mailbox and Sent Items in the GW Client and as INBOX and Sent Items in IMAP.
It now seems to me that depending on the GroupWise Version (and POA
Language) the Mailbox was created and the Version and Language the first
Client that connected to that box, the names in the Client, visible via
SOAP and visible via IMAP differ completely.
Because I have to select the folder in IMAP first (before getting the
mail using the GUID), I need the correct IMAP folder name, otherwise I
can't get the message.

Thanks a lot for your help

Rainer

Labels (1)
0 Likes
17 Replies
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

I'm not sure exactly what you are saying. In Bonsai, you will be able
to specify what language to use in the loginRequest. The folder
names will be in that language. So the folders will match the folder
names as if you logged in with the GWClient. Is that sufficient? Or,
do you have a problem with INBOX vs Mailbox?

Preston

>>> On Friday, July 04, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Rainer

Backes<rbackesno@spambond.de>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still with my archiving application (see some posts before). Now
> I've got a new problem:
>
> I scan the mailboxes for new Items using SOAP (the read cursor calls,
> with retention TS). Because I have to send the items with SMTP to the
> archiving box (it's an appliance called EMA), I fetch the mails etc.
> using IMAP, then they come in the right format and I only have to
> forward them. Now the problem:
>
> When everything is (and was) English, there are no problems with
> foldernames etc, except that the / (root folder) in SOAP is dispayed in
> Mailbox and Sent Items in the GW Client and as INBOX and Sent Items in

IMAP.
> It now seems to me that depending on the GroupWise Version (and POA
> Language) the Mailbox was created and the Version and Language the first
> Client that connected to that box, the names in the Client, visible via
> SOAP and visible via IMAP differ completely.
> Because I have to select the folder in IMAP first (before getting the
> mail using the GUID), I need the correct IMAP folder name, otherwise I
> can't get the message.
>
> Thanks a lot for your help
>
> Rainer

0 Likes
Highlighted
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

As you might remember, I'm currently using IMAP to get the messages in
MIME format. The confusion I have so not between SOAP and GWClient, it
is between SOAP and IMAP.
I already found out that the Mailbox-folder in GWCient is the root
folder in SOAP and the INBOX in IMAP - That's OK.
But the folder 'Sent Items' behaves diffrently - in SOAP you find sent
Items in the root folder - the 'sent Items'-folder in GWClient is a
search result folder. But the name in IMAP varies. It seems that the
folowing happens:
if you have a new mailbox (POA: english) and you log in with a german
client, the system creates(?) a set Items folder named
'Ausgangsnachrichten'. Using IMAP the name of the folder is 'Sent
Items'. That's quite easy and OK.
But if you have a Mailbox that is some years old and was migrated with
the Groupwise Versions, that folder CAN have the name
'Ausgangsnachrichten' in IMAP too. Alternatively, you can have a folder
'sent Items' in GWClient and 'Ausgangsnachrichten' in IMAP. that all
depends of the languages of POAs and GWClients the Mailbox was accessed
with. (I don't dare to imagine, how this would look in simplified
Chinese :-)) ). Not to speak of cases, when the user had renamed the
folder.
I now have the case that a user has created folders with Umlauts in the
name. I currently don't kown how IMAP handles Umlauts.

For all that reasons I will try to switch to HTTP-Streaming to get the
messages, then I don't need to know the foldername, I simply use the id.
(see my next post)


Thanks a lot

Rainer





Preston Stephenson schrieb:
> I'm not sure exactly what you are saying. In Bonsai, you will be able
> to specify what language to use in the loginRequest. The folder
> names will be in that language. So the folders will match the folder
> names as if you logged in with the GWClient. Is that sufficient? Or,
> do you have a problem with INBOX vs Mailbox?
>
> Preston
>
>>>> On Friday, July 04, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Rainer

> Backes<rbackesno@spambond.de>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm still with my archiving application (see some posts before). Now
>> I've got a new problem:
>>
>> I scan the mailboxes for new Items using SOAP (the read cursor calls,
>> with retention TS). Because I have to send the items with SMTP to the
>> archiving box (it's an appliance called EMA), I fetch the mails etc.
>> using IMAP, then they come in the right format and I only have to
>> forward them. Now the problem:
>>
>> When everything is (and was) English, there are no problems with
>> foldernames etc, except that the / (root folder) in SOAP is dispayed in
>> Mailbox and Sent Items in the GW Client and as INBOX and Sent Items in

> IMAP.
>> It now seems to me that depending on the GroupWise Version (and POA
>> Language) the Mailbox was created and the Version and Language the first
>> Client that connected to that box, the names in the Client, visible via
>> SOAP and visible via IMAP differ completely.
>> Because I have to select the folder in IMAP first (before getting the
>> mail using the GUID), I need the correct IMAP folder name, otherwise I
>> can't get the message.
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your help
>>
>> Rainer

>


0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

Rainer Backes wrote:
> As you might remember, I'm currently using IMAP to get the messages in
> MIME format. The confusion I have so not between SOAP and GWClient, it
> is between SOAP and IMAP.
> I already found out that the Mailbox-folder in GWCient is the root
> folder in SOAP and the INBOX in IMAP - That's OK.
> But the folder 'Sent Items' behaves diffrently - in SOAP you find sent
> Items in the root folder - the 'sent Items'-folder in GWClient is a
> search result folder. But the name in IMAP varies. It seems that the
> folowing happens:
> if you have a new mailbox (POA: english) and you log in with a german
> client, the system creates(?) a set Items folder named
> 'Ausgangsnachrichten'. Using IMAP the name of the folder is 'Sent
> Items'. That's quite easy and OK.
> But if you have a Mailbox that is some years old and was migrated with
> the Groupwise Versions, that folder CAN have the name
> 'Ausgangsnachrichten' in IMAP too. Alternatively, you can have a folder
> 'sent Items' in GWClient and 'Ausgangsnachrichten' in IMAP. that all
> depends of the languages of POAs and GWClients the Mailbox was accessed
> with. (I don't dare to imagine, how this would look in simplified
> Chinese :-)) ). Not to speak of cases, when the user had renamed the
> folder.
> I now have the case that a user has created folders with Umlauts in the
> name. I currently don't kown how IMAP handles Umlauts.
>
> For all that reasons I will try to switch to HTTP-Streaming to get the
> messages, then I don't need to know the foldername, I simply use the id.
> (see my next post)
>
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> Rainer
>
>
>
>
>
> Preston Stephenson schrieb:
>> I'm not sure exactly what you are saying. In Bonsai, you will be able
>> to specify what language to use in the loginRequest. The folder
>> names will be in that language. So the folders will match the folder
>> names as if you logged in with the GWClient. Is that sufficient? Or,
>> do you have a problem with INBOX vs Mailbox?
>>
>> Preston
>>
>>>>> On Friday, July 04, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Rainer

>> Backes<rbackesno@spambond.de>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm still with my archiving application (see some posts before). Now
>>> I've got a new problem:
>>>
>>> I scan the mailboxes for new Items using SOAP (the read cursor calls,
>>> with retention TS). Because I have to send the items with SMTP to the
>>> archiving box (it's an appliance called EMA), I fetch the mails etc.
>>> using IMAP, then they come in the right format and I only have to
>>> forward them. Now the problem:
>>>
>>> When everything is (and was) English, there are no problems with
>>> foldernames etc, except that the / (root folder) in SOAP is dispayed
>>> in Mailbox and Sent Items in the GW Client and as INBOX and Sent
>>> Items in

>> IMAP.
>>> It now seems to me that depending on the GroupWise Version (and POA
>>> Language) the Mailbox was created and the Version and Language the
>>> first Client that connected to that box, the names in the Client,
>>> visible via SOAP and visible via IMAP differ completely.
>>> Because I have to select the folder in IMAP first (before getting the
>>> mail using the GUID), I need the correct IMAP folder name, otherwise
>>> I can't get the message.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your help
>>>
>>> Rainer

>>

>

Why not use SOAP entirely and convert it to MIME yourself? If you argue
"but then it's artificial", I'll reply "It is in IMAP too. It only
returns the 'true' mime, if there is a mime.822 attachment. Which you
can see in SOAP and preferentially grab that if it does exist, and only
fake the conversion (which GW would do anyway) if it does not"

0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

So, if needed, you can get the MIME.822 from any email in GroupWise
using the HTTP GET method in Bonsai.
For the folder issue, we tell users to use the FolderType on the folder
and not try to match the folder name.

Preston

>>> On Tuesday, July 08, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Michael

Bell<mikeNOSPAMbell90@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Rainer Backes wrote:
>> As you might remember, I'm currently using IMAP to get the messages in
>> MIME format. The confusion I have so not between SOAP and GWClient, it
>> is between SOAP and IMAP.
>> I already found out that the Mailbox-folder in GWCient is the root
>> folder in SOAP and the INBOX in IMAP - That's OK.
>> But the folder 'Sent Items' behaves diffrently - in SOAP you find sent
>> Items in the root folder - the 'sent Items'-folder in GWClient is a
>> search result folder. But the name in IMAP varies. It seems that the
>> folowing happens:
>> if you have a new mailbox (POA: english) and you log in with a german
>> client, the system creates(?) a set Items folder named
>> 'Ausgangsnachrichten'. Using IMAP the name of the folder is 'Sent
>> Items'. That's quite easy and OK.
>> But if you have a Mailbox that is some years old and was migrated with
>> the Groupwise Versions, that folder CAN have the name
>> 'Ausgangsnachrichten' in IMAP too. Alternatively, you can have a folder
>> 'sent Items' in GWClient and 'Ausgangsnachrichten' in IMAP. that all
>> depends of the languages of POAs and GWClients the Mailbox was accessed
>> with. (I don't dare to imagine, how this would look in simplified
>> Chinese :-)) ). Not to speak of cases, when the user had renamed the
>> folder.
>> I now have the case that a user has created folders with Umlauts in the
>> name. I currently don't kown how IMAP handles Umlauts.
>>
>> For all that reasons I will try to switch to HTTP-Streaming to get the
>> messages, then I don't need to know the foldername, I simply use the id.
>> (see my next post)
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>>
>> Rainer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Preston Stephenson schrieb:
>>> I'm not sure exactly what you are saying. In Bonsai, you will be able
>>> to specify what language to use in the loginRequest. The folder
>>> names will be in that language. So the folders will match the folder
>>> names as if you logged in with the GWClient. Is that sufficient? Or,
>>> do you have a problem with INBOX vs Mailbox?
>>>
>>> Preston
>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, July 04, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Rainer
>>> Backes<rbackesno@spambond.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm still with my archiving application (see some posts before). Now
>>>> I've got a new problem:
>>>>
>>>> I scan the mailboxes for new Items using SOAP (the read cursor calls,
>>>> with retention TS). Because I have to send the items with SMTP to the
>>>> archiving box (it's an appliance called EMA), I fetch the mails etc.
>>>> using IMAP, then they come in the right format and I only have to
>>>> forward them. Now the problem:
>>>>
>>>> When everything is (and was) English, there are no problems with
>>>> foldernames etc, except that the / (root folder) in SOAP is dispayed
>>>> in Mailbox and Sent Items in the GW Client and as INBOX and Sent
>>>> Items in
>>> IMAP.
>>>> It now seems to me that depending on the GroupWise Version (and POA
>>>> Language) the Mailbox was created and the Version and Language the
>>>> first Client that connected to that box, the names in the Client,
>>>> visible via SOAP and visible via IMAP differ completely.
>>>> Because I have to select the folder in IMAP first (before getting the
>>>> mail using the GUID), I need the correct IMAP folder name, otherwise
>>>> I can't get the message.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for your help
>>>>
>>>> Rainer
>>>

>>

> Why not use SOAP entirely and convert it to MIME yourself? If you argue
> "but then it's artificial", I'll reply "It is in IMAP too. It only
> returns the 'true' mime, if there is a mime.822 attachment. Which you
> can see in SOAP and preferentially grab that if it does exist, and only
> fake the conversion (which GW would do anyway) if it does not"

0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

Preston, I know now that I have to wait for Bonsai to get that feature.
But my customers NOW beat me because I can't get all their Emails out of
their Mailboxes to the archive, so the success of my solution depends on it.
Michael, I simply was too lazy to write (and test) that whole
'expensive code' (as Preston states) by myself. But it looks as if I
don't have another choice.

Rainer

Preston Stephenson schrieb:
> So, if needed, you can get the MIME.822 from any email in GroupWise
> using the HTTP GET method in Bonsai.
> For the folder issue, we tell users to use the FolderType on the folder
> and not try to match the folder name.
>
> Preston
>
>>>> On Tuesday, July 08, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Michael

> Bell<mikeNOSPAMbell90@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>> Rainer Backes wrote:
>>> As you might remember, I'm currently using IMAP to get the messages in
>>> MIME format. The confusion I have so not between SOAP and GWClient, it
>>> is between SOAP and IMAP.
>>> I already found out that the Mailbox-folder in GWCient is the root
>>> folder in SOAP and the INBOX in IMAP - That's OK.
>>> But the folder 'Sent Items' behaves diffrently - in SOAP you find sent
>>> Items in the root folder - the 'sent Items'-folder in GWClient is a
>>> search result folder. But the name in IMAP varies. It seems that the
>>> folowing happens:
>>> if you have a new mailbox (POA: english) and you log in with a german
>>> client, the system creates(?) a set Items folder named
>>> 'Ausgangsnachrichten'. Using IMAP the name of the folder is 'Sent
>>> Items'. That's quite easy and OK.
>>> But if you have a Mailbox that is some years old and was migrated with
>>> the Groupwise Versions, that folder CAN have the name
>>> 'Ausgangsnachrichten' in IMAP too. Alternatively, you can have a folder
>>> 'sent Items' in GWClient and 'Ausgangsnachrichten' in IMAP. that all
>>> depends of the languages of POAs and GWClients the Mailbox was accessed
>>> with. (I don't dare to imagine, how this would look in simplified
>>> Chinese :-)) ). Not to speak of cases, when the user had renamed the
>>> folder.
>>> I now have the case that a user has created folders with Umlauts in the
>>> name. I currently don't kown how IMAP handles Umlauts.
>>>
>>> For all that reasons I will try to switch to HTTP-Streaming to get the
>>> messages, then I don't need to know the foldername, I simply use the id.
>>> (see my next post)
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot
>>>
>>> Rainer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Preston Stephenson schrieb:
>>>> I'm not sure exactly what you are saying. In Bonsai, you will be able
>>>> to specify what language to use in the loginRequest. The folder
>>>> names will be in that language. So the folders will match the folder
>>>> names as if you logged in with the GWClient. Is that sufficient? Or,
>>>> do you have a problem with INBOX vs Mailbox?
>>>>
>>>> Preston
>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, July 04, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Rainer
>>>> Backes<rbackesno@spambond.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still with my archiving application (see some posts before). Now
>>>>> I've got a new problem:
>>>>>
>>>>> I scan the mailboxes for new Items using SOAP (the read cursor calls,
>>>>> with retention TS). Because I have to send the items with SMTP to the
>>>>> archiving box (it's an appliance called EMA), I fetch the mails etc.
>>>>> using IMAP, then they come in the right format and I only have to
>>>>> forward them. Now the problem:
>>>>>
>>>>> When everything is (and was) English, there are no problems with
>>>>> foldernames etc, except that the / (root folder) in SOAP is dispayed
>>>>> in Mailbox and Sent Items in the GW Client and as INBOX and Sent
>>>>> Items in
>>>> IMAP.
>>>>> It now seems to me that depending on the GroupWise Version (and POA
>>>>> Language) the Mailbox was created and the Version and Language the
>>>>> first Client that connected to that box, the names in the Client,
>>>>> visible via SOAP and visible via IMAP differ completely.
>>>>> Because I have to select the folder in IMAP first (before getting the
>>>>> mail using the GUID), I need the correct IMAP folder name, otherwise
>>>>> I can't get the message.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot for your help
>>>>>
>>>>> Rainer

>> Why not use SOAP entirely and convert it to MIME yourself? If you argue
>> "but then it's artificial", I'll reply "It is in IMAP too. It only
>> returns the 'true' mime, if there is a mime.822 attachment. Which you
>> can see in SOAP and preferentially grab that if it does exist, and only
>> fake the conversion (which GW would do anyway) if it does not"

>


0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

Since you do code in Pascal...Ref. other thread, you might consider
this as well.....

1) Grap the mime.822 attachment using soap if present, and if not,
spawn a com-based app on the windows box hosting your app.....

Do a trusted Login as the user, and export the thingy using tokens....
With 7.0.3, there's a token to save a mail as mime called


Quating a post from the token fora:

From: "Tommy Mikkelsen" <tm@NoDevSpAmitq.dk>
Subject: Announcment.....New functionallity, that's not in the docs
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:37:11 GMT
Message-ID: <Hwrqj.30609$k06.6202@kovat.provo.novell.com>
Newsgroups: novell.devsup.gwtoken

If running the latest version of GW7.0.2HP, you can now both import and
export a mime


The token to import a mime is:
RetrieveMime
"Filename" -- name of the file
"BoxType" one of
"Inbox|" - 6
"Outbox" 7
"Draft" 666
"Personal 198
"FolderName" optional folder name to save it in
"CreateFolder" boolean optional, if true create the folder if not there

The token to save the message as a mime is:
ItemSaveMessage

"MessageID" - message to save or 00 for the current one
"Filename" -- where to save it
"FileFormat" one of
"AnsiText" 106
"Mime" 900
"RichText" 899
"WordPerfect60" 269


--
/Tommy
0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

eh, tommy that's ingenious but sounds like a seriously slow and ugly
deck o cards 🙂

Tommy Mikkelsen wrote:
> Since you do code in Pascal...Ref. other thread, you might consider
> this as well.....
>
> 1) Grap the mime.822 attachment using soap if present, and if not,
> spawn a com-based app on the windows box hosting your app.....
>
> Do a trusted Login as the user, and export the thingy using tokens....
> With 7.0.3, there's a token to save a mail as mime called
>
>
> Quating a post from the token fora:
>
> From: "Tommy Mikkelsen" <tm@NoDevSpAmitq.dk>
> Subject: Announcment.....New functionallity, that's not in the docs
> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:37:11 GMT
> Message-ID: <Hwrqj.30609$k06.6202@kovat.provo.novell.com>
> Newsgroups: novell.devsup.gwtoken
>
> If running the latest version of GW7.0.2HP, you can now both import and
> export a mime
>
>
> The token to import a mime is:
> RetrieveMime
> "Filename" -- name of the file
> "BoxType" one of
> "Inbox|" - 6
> "Outbox" 7
> "Draft" 666
> "Personal 198
> "FolderName" optional folder name to save it in
> "CreateFolder" boolean optional, if true create the folder if not there
>
> The token to save the message as a mime is:
> ItemSaveMessage
>
> "MessageID" - message to save or 00 for the current one
> "Filename" -- where to save it
> "FileFormat" one of
> "AnsiText" 106
> "Mime" 900
> "RichText" 899
> "WordPerfect60" 269
>
>

0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

LOL, and yes......

But if a solution is needed for GW7, this might do the trick....

Building a mime yourself isn't just something you do in a split sec.


--
/Tommy
0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

Hi Tommy,

Could you consider another plattform than Windows?

I'm working on Linux! (with FreePascal and Lazarus)

That IMAP thing was simply to avoid coding the MIME transformation by
myself. But it seems to make more trouble than it's worth.
My first test with new (not migrated) systems showed great results, so I
was convinced I had found the right solution.
But now at the customer, it appears that I was on the wrong way.

Thanks

Rainer


Tommy Mikkelsen schrieb:
> Since you do code in Pascal...Ref. other thread, you might consider
> this as well.....
>
> 1) Grap the mime.822 attachment using soap if present, and if not,
> spawn a com-based app on the windows box hosting your app.....
>
> Do a trusted Login as the user, and export the thingy using tokens....
> With 7.0.3, there's a token to save a mail as mime called
>
>
> Quating a post from the token fora:
>
> From: "Tommy Mikkelsen" <tm@NoDevSpAmitq.dk>
> Subject: Announcment.....New functionallity, that's not in the docs
> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:37:11 GMT
> Message-ID: <Hwrqj.30609$k06.6202@kovat.provo.novell.com>
> Newsgroups: novell.devsup.gwtoken
>
> If running the latest version of GW7.0.2HP, you can now both import and
> export a mime
>
>
> The token to import a mime is:
> RetrieveMime
> "Filename" -- name of the file
> "BoxType" one of
> "Inbox|" - 6
> "Outbox" 7
> "Draft" 666
> "Personal 198
> "FolderName" optional folder name to save it in
> "CreateFolder" boolean optional, if true create the folder if not there
>
> The token to save the message as a mime is:
> ItemSaveMessage
>
> "MessageID" - message to save or 00 for the current one
> "Filename" -- where to save it
> "FileFormat" one of
> "AnsiText" 106
> "Mime" 900
> "RichText" 899
> "WordPerfect60" 269
>
>


0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

That's why I tried the way using IMAP......

Tommy Mikkelsen schrieb:
> LOL, and yes......
>
> But if a solution is needed for GW7, this might do the trick....
>
> Building a mime yourself isn't just something you do in a split sec.
>
>


0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

Hehehe...Fooled me there 😉

Well....Grap all attachments, and build a mime would be the way I would
go then...

Might be able to use this one to build the mime, but since I never used
FreePascal, I don't know....

http://www.indyproject.org/Sockets/fpc/index.EN.aspx


--
/Tommy
0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

I use Synapse as the foundation of all networking and this library also
has a specialized object (class) to create a MIME-message. I'll give it
a try (or should I say: I have to 🙂 )

Thanks


Tommy Mikkelsen schrieb:
> Hehehe...Fooled me there 😉
>
> Well....Grap all attachments, and build a mime would be the way I would
> go then...
>
> Might be able to use this one to build the mime, but since I never used
> FreePascal, I don't know....
>
> http://www.indyproject.org/Sockets/fpc/index.EN.aspx
>
>


0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

Rainer Backes wrote:

> I have to


Good luck.......

Tried with Delphi once, and it was a nightmare.....

Lucky for me, the token was released, and since I was writing a C3PO, I
could simply switch.

--
/Tommy
0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Folder Confusion

Rainer Backes wrote:
> I use Synapse as the foundation of all networking and this library also
> has a specialized object (class) to create a MIME-message. I'll give it
> a try (or should I say: I have to 🙂 )
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Tommy Mikkelsen schrieb:
>> Hehehe...Fooled me there 😉
>>
>> Well....Grap all attachments, and build a mime would be the way I would
>> go then...
>>
>> Might be able to use this one to build the mime, but since I never used
>> FreePascal, I don't know....
>>
>> http://www.indyproject.org/Sockets/fpc/index.EN.aspx
>>
>>

>

Where I see create mime from scratch could suck is

multipart/related and compound picture stuff. You are (sort of) given
this info in soap, but it looks tricky...
0 Likes
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Micro Focus. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. As of September 1, 2017, the Material is now offered by Micro Focus, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks is historical in nature, and the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks are the property of their respective owners.