ScorpionSting

Absent Member.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2018-02-27
03:25
1482 views
4.6.2.x IDM Apps SOAP Call
Hmmm...was just testing some stuff to work out how to achieve another goal....I have an Integration Activity to perform getCodeMapValues from the IRemoteResourceBinding with just the Entitlement DN as the value (works in SoapUI), but the Integration activity spits out:
This is a version of IDMProv between 4.6.2 and 4.6.2.1 (to be released after 4.7)....so not sure if its a bug or something else....
Visit my Website for links to Cool Solution articles.
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException : com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSXObjectFactory
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException : com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSServiceXObjectFactory
Errors encountered while loading factories:
Enabler status errors:
Enabler: 3270; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: 3270logon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: 5250; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: 5250logon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: CICSRPC; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: EDI; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: HTML; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: JMS; Error: Cannot get build for: com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSXObjectFactory
Enabler: JMSService; Error: Cannot get build for: com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSServiceXObjectFactory
Enabler: PROCESS; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: TELNET; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: Telnetlogon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
"
This is a version of IDMProv between 4.6.2 and 4.6.2.1 (to be released after 4.7)....so not sure if its a bug or something else....
Visit my Website for links to Cool Solution articles.
6 Replies
AutomaticReply

Absent Member.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2018-03-05
05:30
ScorpionSting,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
These forums are peer-to-peer, best effort, volunteer run and that if your issue
is urgent or not getting a response, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit https://www.microfocus.com/support-and-services and search the knowledgebase and/or check
all the other self support options and support programs available.
- Open a service request: https://www.microfocus.com/support
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.microfocus.com)
- You might consider hiring a local partner to assist you.
https://www.partnernetprogram.com/partnerfinder/find.html
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.microfocus.com/faq.php
Sometimes this automatic posting will alert someone that can respond.
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting or otherwise posted in error, please
ignore and accept our apologies and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand
to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Micro Focus Forums Team
http://forums.microfocus.com
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
These forums are peer-to-peer, best effort, volunteer run and that if your issue
is urgent or not getting a response, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit https://www.microfocus.com/support-and-services and search the knowledgebase and/or check
all the other self support options and support programs available.
- Open a service request: https://www.microfocus.com/support
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.microfocus.com)
- You might consider hiring a local partner to assist you.
https://www.partnernetprogram.com/partnerfinder/find.html
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.microfocus.com/faq.php
Sometimes this automatic posting will alert someone that can respond.
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting or otherwise posted in error, please
ignore and accept our apologies and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand
to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Micro Focus Forums Team
http://forums.microfocus.com
rreid

Commodore
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2018-03-08
17:31
I am seeing the same thing in IDMProv 4.62 just installed in our dev system. Did you figure it out?
rreid

Commodore
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2018-03-08
19:21
We found our issue. The integration activity was pointing to an invalid path for the workflow.
angelab1

Absent Member.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2018-06-25
23:23
rreid;2476888 wrote:
We found our issue. The integration activity was pointing to an invalid path for the workflow.
Same error in Integration activities with IDM 4.7 and eDir 9.1 on Windows, recently updated from 4.5.6. Checked, I do not find any invalid path in the workflow.
Any idea to resolve this issue?
Thanks.
rrawson

Vice Admiral
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2018-10-19
13:59
ScorpionSting;2476267 wrote:
Hmmm...was just testing some stuff to work out how to achieve another goal....I have an Integration Activity to perform getCodeMapValues from the IRemoteResourceBinding with just the Entitlement DN as the value (works in SoapUI), but the Integration activity spits out:java.lang.ClassNotFoundException : com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSXObjectFactory
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException : com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSServiceXObjectFactory
Errors encountered while loading factories:
Enabler status errors:
Enabler: 3270; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: 3270logon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: 5250; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: 5250logon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: CICSRPC; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: EDI; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: HTML; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: JMS; Error: Cannot get build for: com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSXObjectFactory
Enabler: JMSService; Error: Cannot get build for: com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSServiceXObjectFactory
Enabler: PROCESS; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: TELNET; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
Enabler: Telnetlogon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
"
This is a version of IDMProv between 4.6.2 and 4.6.2.1 (to be released after 4.7)....so not sure if its a bug or something else....
trying to do something similar and having a similar behavior. I recognize all this "Enabler" stuff, it's from the original "SilverStream composer" which I used in a project about 10 year ago pre-release to build an IDM driver which leveraged 3270 TDS. It was shelved due to complexity and due to cross licensing requirements. I guess they left hooks in there...


Knowledge Partner
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2018-10-19
17:07
On 10/19/2018 9:04 AM, rrawson wrote:
>
> ScorpionSting;2476267 Wrote:
>> Hmmm...was just testing some stuff to work out how to achieve another
>> goal....I have an Integration Activity to perform getCodeMapValues from
>> the IRemoteResourceBinding with just the Entitlement DN as the value
>> (works in SoapUI), but the Integration activity spits out:
>>
>>
>>>
> Code:
> --------------------
> > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException : com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSXObjectFactory
> > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException : com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSServiceXObjectFactory
> >
> >
> > Errors encountered while loading factories:
> > Enabler status errors:
> > Enabler: 3270; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: 3270logon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: 5250; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: 5250logon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: CICSRPC; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: EDI; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: HTML; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: JMS; Error: Cannot get build for: com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSXObjectFactory
> > Enabler: JMSService; Error: Cannot get build for: com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSServiceXObjectFactory
> > Enabler: PROCESS; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: TELNET; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: Telnetlogon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> >
> > "
> --------------------
>>>
>>
>> This is a version of IDMProv between 4.6.2 and 4.6.2.1 (to be released
>> after 4.7)....so not sure if its a bug or something else....
> trying to do something similar and having a similar behavior. I
> recognize all this "Enabler" stuff, it's from the original "SilverStream
> composer" which I used in a project about 10 year ago pre-release to
> build an IDM driver which leveraged 3270 TDS. It was shelved due to
> complexity and due to cross licensing requirements. I guess they left
> hooks in there...
Yes the Integration Activity (UI in Designer as well) is basically the
main remnants of Composer that are not yet removed.
For those who never saw it, Composer was actually pretty cool, but the
UI from hell. It has so much stuff to show you, it was overwhelming and
confusing.
None of that helps Ben though.
>
> ScorpionSting;2476267 Wrote:
>> Hmmm...was just testing some stuff to work out how to achieve another
>> goal....I have an Integration Activity to perform getCodeMapValues from
>> the IRemoteResourceBinding with just the Entitlement DN as the value
>> (works in SoapUI), but the Integration activity spits out:
>>
>>
>>>
> Code:
> --------------------
> > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException : com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSXObjectFactory
> > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException : com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSServiceXObjectFactory
> >
> >
> > Errors encountered while loading factories:
> > Enabler status errors:
> > Enabler: 3270; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: 3270logon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: 5250; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: 5250logon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: CICSRPC; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: EDI; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: HTML; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: JMS; Error: Cannot get build for: com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSXObjectFactory
> > Enabler: JMSService; Error: Cannot get build for: com.sssw.b2b.ee.jms.rt.GNVJMSServiceXObjectFactory
> > Enabler: PROCESS; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: TELNET; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> > Enabler: Telnetlogon; Error: Current License Version is 60 but version 52 is required
> >
> > "
> --------------------
>>>
>>
>> This is a version of IDMProv between 4.6.2 and 4.6.2.1 (to be released
>> after 4.7)....so not sure if its a bug or something else....
> trying to do something similar and having a similar behavior. I
> recognize all this "Enabler" stuff, it's from the original "SilverStream
> composer" which I used in a project about 10 year ago pre-release to
> build an IDM driver which leveraged 3270 TDS. It was shelved due to
> complexity and due to cross licensing requirements. I guess they left
> hooks in there...
Yes the Integration Activity (UI in Designer as well) is basically the
main remnants of Composer that are not yet removed.
For those who never saw it, Composer was actually pretty cool, but the
UI from hell. It has so much stuff to show you, it was overwhelming and
confusing.
None of that helps Ben though.