rrawson

Vice Admiral
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2015-07-13
18:55
245 views
Read tree name via LDAP
Tried to Read rootDSE through IDVault object, which should publish this,
but no luck, although I can make the query (send a DN of " ") and
request to read directoryTreeName LDAP trace looks good but it does not
return a response. Anyone have a trick for reading the tree name via an
IDVault call?
thanx
Rob
--
rrawson
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rrawson's Profile: https://forums.netiq.com/member.php?userid=403
View this thread: https://forums.netiq.com/showthread.php?t=53875
7 Replies
Anonymous_User

Absent Member.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2015-07-20
05:30
rrawson,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your issue been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://www.netiq.com/support and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other support options available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.netiq.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.netiq.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your NetIQ Forums Team
http://forums.netiq.com
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your issue been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://www.netiq.com/support and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other support options available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.netiq.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.netiq.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your NetIQ Forums Team
http://forums.netiq.com


Knowledge Partner
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2015-08-06
10:04
Nope,
But it should be possible to expose the dirxml.auto.treename gcv and
read that.
--
joakim_ganse
------------------------------------------------------------------------
joakim_ganse's Profile: https://forums.netiq.com/member.php?userid=159
View this thread: https://forums.netiq.com/showthread.php?t=53875


Knowledge Partner
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2015-08-06
14:07
On 8/6/2015 5:04 AM, joakim ganse wrote:
>
> Nope,
>
> But it should be possible to expose the dirxml.auto.treename gcv and
> read that.
UA does not read the Auto GCV's properly. So nope. I agree, that should
have worked, but UA does not do it the way I would expect.
>
> Nope,
>
> But it should be possible to expose the dirxml.auto.treename gcv and
> read that.
UA does not read the Auto GCV's properly. So nope. I agree, that should
have worked, but UA does not do it the way I would expect.


Knowledge Partner
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2015-08-06
16:04
Enhancement or bug?
--
joakim_ganse
------------------------------------------------------------------------
joakim_ganse's Profile: https://forums.netiq.com/member.php?userid=159
View this thread: https://forums.netiq.com/showthread.php?t=53875


Knowledge Partner
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2015-08-06
17:23
On 8/6/2015 11:04 AM, joakim ganse wrote:
>
> Enhancement or bug?
Bug. If you support GCV's, you support GCV's or you do not. It is not
an enhancement to do what you are supposed to do.
>
> Enhancement or bug?
Bug. If you support GCV's, you support GCV's or you do not. It is not
an enhancement to do what you are supposed to do.
Anonymous_User

Absent Member.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2015-08-09
16:06
On 08/06/2015 12:23 PM, Geoffrey Carman wrote:
> On 8/6/2015 11:04 AM, joakim ganse wrote:
>>
>> Enhancement or bug?
>
> Bug. If you support GCV's, you support GCV's or you do not. It is not
> an enhancement to do what you are supposed to do.
>
>
Greetings,
Unless I am not understanding this correctly, it would be an
Enhancement request that you could enter into RMS. I am pretty sure
there was information in the documentation that stated the WF engine
only supports GCVs that are added to the UAD or the DriverSet.
--
Sincerely,
Steven Williams
Lead Software Engineer
Micro Focus
> On 8/6/2015 11:04 AM, joakim ganse wrote:
>>
>> Enhancement or bug?
>
> Bug. If you support GCV's, you support GCV's or you do not. It is not
> an enhancement to do what you are supposed to do.
>
>
Greetings,
Unless I am not understanding this correctly, it would be an
Enhancement request that you could enter into RMS. I am pretty sure
there was information in the documentation that stated the WF engine
only supports GCVs that are added to the UAD or the DriverSet.
--
Sincerely,
Steven Williams
Lead Software Engineer
Micro Focus


Knowledge Partner
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
2015-08-09
19:35
On 8/9/2015 11:06 AM, Steven Williams wrote:
> On 08/06/2015 12:23 PM, Geoffrey Carman wrote:
>> On 8/6/2015 11:04 AM, joakim ganse wrote:
>>>
>>> Enhancement or bug?
>>
>> Bug. If you support GCV's, you support GCV's or you do not. It is not
>> an enhancement to do what you are supposed to do.
>>
>>
> Greetings,
> Unless I am not understanding this correctly, it would be an
> Enhancement request that you could enter into RMS. I am pretty sure
> there was information in the documentation that stated the WF engine
> only supports GCVs that are added to the UAD or the DriverSet.
But there are automatic GCV's available on all drivers. We quibble
about the notion of 'added' vs 'on'. I say if the driver supports them,
then the UAD driver should be supporting them for use in AD.
> On 08/06/2015 12:23 PM, Geoffrey Carman wrote:
>> On 8/6/2015 11:04 AM, joakim ganse wrote:
>>>
>>> Enhancement or bug?
>>
>> Bug. If you support GCV's, you support GCV's or you do not. It is not
>> an enhancement to do what you are supposed to do.
>>
>>
> Greetings,
> Unless I am not understanding this correctly, it would be an
> Enhancement request that you could enter into RMS. I am pretty sure
> there was information in the documentation that stated the WF engine
> only supports GCVs that are added to the UAD or the DriverSet.
But there are automatic GCV's available on all drivers. We quibble
about the notion of 'added' vs 'on'. I say if the driver supports them,
then the UAD driver should be supporting them for use in AD.