With the current pace at releasing new versions, some of us would like to have that faster, while others of us would need it much, much slower due to the effort it takes to get to the yet next release in any (very) large installation.
So why not have both?
"Fast versions" every 3 months - which have a rather small, let's say 15 month' life of being fully supported. We will be off the then next version by that time anyways!
"Slow versions" every 15 months or less - which have a much longer, let's say 6 years life of being fully supported and patches every 6 month. This will give us the time we need to do the testing and deploying and using in our very large productions, plus a small gap before moving forward to the next cycle.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.