barney_barnes Absent Member.
Absent Member.
2118 views

Which is the best protocol to use?

hi all
As Im not an avid Mac user i ask the question, if one had a choice, which would be the best protocol to use, CIFS or AFP? This would be on a OES2 clustered enviroment.

I look forward to your thoughts.

cheers

BarneyB

Barney Barnes :) SysAdmin Beaverbrooks Organic Technology Department
Labels (1)
0 Likes
5 Replies
warper2 Super Contributor.
Super Contributor.

Re: Which is the best protocol to use?

barney barnes wrote:

>
> hi all
> As Im not an avid Mac user i ask the question, if one had a choice,
> which would be the best protocol to use, CIFS or AFP? This would be on a
> OES2 clustered enviroment.
>
> I look forward to your thoughts.
>
> cheers
>
> BarneyB
>
>


I would say to use AFP. It is the native mac protocol and OES2 or OES11
will leave CIFS in the dust as far as speed. I have spent a lot of time
testing this. I am not sure how many afp users you have.

0 Likes
barney_barnes Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Which is the best protocol to use?

hi
yes afp would be my choice for sure and im aware that cifs/smb can be very slow and hungry but as we only have a few mac
users less than 10 at the moment we have just been getting by with webdav. not kool. so this is the solution we need to make
life a bit better for all of us.
i need some technical justification for afp before we install the protocol, so any data on the pros and cons of the 2 protocols
would be grand.

cheers

barneyb

Barney Barnes :) SysAdmin Beaverbrooks Organic Technology Department
0 Likes
warper2 Super Contributor.
Super Contributor.

Re: Which is the best protocol to use?

barney barnes wrote:

>
> hi
> yes afp would be my choice for sure and im aware that cifs/smb can be
> very slow and hungry but as we only have a few mac
> users less than 10 at the moment we have just been getting by with
> webdav. not kool. so this is the solution we need to make
> life a bit better for all of us.
> i need some technical justification for afp before we install the
> protocol, so any data on the pros and cons of the 2 protocols
> would be grand.
>
> cheers
>
> barneyb
>
>


Are these Lion Or Snow Leopard? Lions smb/cifs protocol sucks now.
0 Likes
Knowledge Partner
Knowledge Partner

Re: Which is the best protocol to use?

On 15/02/2012 08:46, barney barnes wrote:

> As Im not an avid Mac user i ask the question, if one had a choice,
> which would be the best protocol to use, CIFS or AFP? This would be on a
> OES2 clustered enviroment.
>
> I look forward to your thoughts.


Personally if I had a choice I'd use AFP for Macs and CIFS for Windows.
Basically use the native protocol for each.

There are however a couple of reasons you may want to consider using
CIFS for both:

1) AFP doesn't support Dynamic Storage Technology whereas CIFS does
2) using CIFS gives you one protocol to support

CIFS does have it's issues for Mac users though, particularly with OS X
Lion where Apple changed how they implemented SMB support (dropping
Samba in favour of their own code). The latest Lion update, 10.7.3,
includes fixes that "Address compatibility issues with Microsoft Windows
file sharing".

HTH.
--
Simon
Novell/SUSE/NetIQ Knowledge Partner

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you work with Novell technologies at a university, college or school?
If so, your campus could benefit from joining the Novell Technology
Transfer Partner (TTP) program. See novell.com/ttp for more details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Likes
barney_barnes Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Which is the best protocol to use?

Good feedback. Thanks Simon very good info 🙂

Barney Barnes :) SysAdmin Beaverbrooks Organic Technology Department
0 Likes
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Micro Focus. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. As of September 1, 2017, the Material is now offered by Micro Focus, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks is historical in nature, and the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks are the property of their respective owners.