Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

DZanre,
> Today is my eldest daughter's birthday, and the significance of this
> particular age is that she is 1/2 my age. Of course, I can't tell you how
> old she is now <heehee> as it seems unbelievable to me that I'm not that age
> NOW.
>


In a month, my daughter will be 1/3 my age. She won't be half my age
until I'm 70.


0 Likes
dzanre1 Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

Doug Black wrote:

> In a month, my daughter will be 1/3 my age. She won't be half my age
> until I'm 70.


Is this a math quiz <g>. If it is, my father would have said that you
just "turned 35" on your last birthday

--
Danita
http://www.caledonia.net/blog
0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:53:18 +0000, DZanre wrote:

> Is this a math quiz <g>.


No because it doesn't involve the velocity of two trains traveling away
from each other.

--
Joe
"Those of you who think you know everything are annoying to those of us who do."

0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

Joseph Marton wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:53:18 +0000, DZanre wrote:
>
>> Is this a math quiz <g>.

>
> No because it doesn't involve the velocity of two trains traveling away
> from each other.
>


Yeah but will the plane take off the treadmill going in the opposite
direction?

Ted Novak
TRA#5512
IEAS#75
0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:24:09 +0000, § wrote:

> Yeah but will the plane take off the treadmill going in the opposite
> direction?


It depends on the air-land velocity of the maiden swallow.

--
Joe
"Those of you who think you know everything are annoying to those of us who do."

0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

DZanre,

>
>> In a month, my daughter will be 1/3 my age. She won't be half my age
>> until I'm 70.

>
> Is this a math quiz <g>. If it is, my father would have said that you
> just "turned 35" on your last birthday
>




No, I was 35 when she was born. I'm 51 now and she'll be 17 next month.
17 x 3 = 51.

So are you saying your father wasn't good at math? <ducking>

0 Likes
shaunpond Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

Joseph,

or Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow?

--

Shaun Pond


0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

It's not a matter of where 'e grips it!

Shaun Pond wrote:
> Joseph,
>
> or Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow?
>

0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:49:15 +0000, Shaun Pond wrote:

> or Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow?


Yeah, that, too.

--
Joe
"Those of you who think you know everything are annoying to those of us who do."

0 Likes
shaunpond Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

Doug,

> I'm 51 now
>

a good age, IMO 😉

--

Shaun Pond


0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

Shaun Pond wrote:

> Doug,
>
> > I'm 51 now
> >

> a good age, IMO 😉


Youngsters!

--
Lindsey
0 Likes
dzanre1 Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

Doug Black wrote:

> So are you saying your father wasn't good at math? <ducking>


No, I was thinking you were about 53, and that is "turning 35". I'm the one
bad at math <g>.

--
Danita
http://www.caledonia.net/blog
0 Likes
dzanre1 Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

DZanre wrote:

> No, I was thinking you were about 53, and that is "turning 35". I'm the
> one bad at math <g>.


But it was a bit of a trick question, because 51-35 isn't 17 <g>.

--
Danita
http://www.caledonia.net/blog
0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

Shaun,

>
>> I'm 51 now
>>

> a good age, IMO 😉
>


I'm enjoying it too. 🙂



0 Likes
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: Birthday Girl

DZanre,
>
>> No, I was thinking you were about 53, and that is "turning 35". I'm the
>> one bad at math <g>.

>
> But it was a bit of a trick question, because 51-35 isn't 17 <g>.
>


So I was a year off. :">


0 Likes
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Micro Focus. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. As of September 1, 2017, the Material is now offered by Micro Focus, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks is historical in nature, and the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks are the property of their respective owners.