Frankie_Kings Super Contributor.
Super Contributor.
163 views

Plans for any enhancements to the way PPM currenlty operates

Team, our Project Management department has some questions around if there are plans for enhancements or changes to some functionalities of PPM, mainly in the Project Module space.  Would today's forum have any one involved from the Product Development area that could at least provide a brief answer if we note some questions?

They are running into some issues of how PPM handles task dates, assignments and have some recommendations for some options they would like to see.

EXample: Are there plans to have an option for capacity planning driving off the ERE vs the scheduled effort especially in a case where ERE + actual effort is greater or less than the scheduled effort? This would help us avoid updating scheduled effort to equal ERE + Actual effort.

 Please let me know if today's forum could assist in some of these questions or if it best for us to go thru our site's PPM product manager.

Thank you.

Frank

0 Likes
4 Replies
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert

Re: Plans for any enhancements to the way PPM currenlty operates

Hi Frank,

Let's start with list of questions you have at this point of time and see how much we can address over there, if some of these happen to be ERs and that I would recommending logging ER incident with support....

0 Likes
Frankie_Kings Super Contributor.
Super Contributor.

Re: Plans for any enhancements to the way PPM currenlty operates

Here are some of the questions our Project Mgt team has; mainly around the project module and if there are any possible enhancements planned around this in future release. 

1.  Are there plans to set the actual finish to the day the PM marks the task 100% complete such as, in cases where no time is reported or the task would close in the future? Today, we have to remind PM’s not to close the task in the future when instead the tool should default to current date when PM manually closes the task.

2. Are there plans to have the capacity planning driving off the ERE vs the scheduled effort especially in a case where ERE + actual effort is greater or less than the scheduled effort? This would help us avoid updating scheduled effort to equal ERE + Actual effort.

3. Are there plans to allow resources on a single task to have varying start/finish timeframes? Currently they are locked in to the task start/finish dates?

4.Have they thought about highlighting fields in the schedule that are impacted when making changes to the schedule, for example when hitting the ‘scheduler’ button? Additionally, how about providing a choice to automatically schedule the work plan when making changes vs. having to hit the ‘scheduler’ button?

5. When doing data exports using a future timeframe, how do you eliminate previous projects that are closed from showing?

6. Having the ability to share work plan views (schedule view/costing/customized) among projects and also among PM’s would increase productivity.

Appreciate you taking the time to review these and let me know if you need further info or which you think could be candidates for an ER.  Thanks!

Frank

 

0 Likes
Frankie_Kings Super Contributor.
Super Contributor.

Re: Plans for any enhancements to the way PPM currenlty operates

Hello, i was just following up if you had the opportunity to review the kind of questions our Project team has and have any suggestions or recommendations.  If we should follow the 'enhancement' process with HP Support then please confirm and let me know.

Appreciate your time.

Frank

0 Likes
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert

Re: Plans for any enhancements to the way PPM currenlty operates

Hi Frank,

Here is my response....

  • Are there plans to set the actual finish to the day the PM marks the task 100% complete such as, in cases where no time is reported or the task would close in the future? Today, we have to remind PM’s not to close the task in the future when instead the tool should default to current date when PM manually closes the task.

[Cyclops] Currently in PPM if you close a task without entering actuals, it takes the schedule date by default as actual, I think there is scope for implementing a parameter where we can either use the date when a task was closed or schedule date. Could you kindly log an ER for this?

  1. Are there plans to have the capacity planning driving off the ERE vs the scheduled effort especially in a case where ERE + actual effort is greater or less than the scheduled effort? This would help us avoid updating scheduled effort to equal ERE + Actual effort.

[Cyclops] Kindly log an ER for this.

  1. Are there plans to allow resources on a single task to have varying start/finish timeframes? Currently they are locked in to the task start/finish dates?

[Cyclops] Are you look to have this resources used by different projects? If yes, than from PPM stand point we more look at capacity of the resource.

  1. Have they thought about highlighting fields in the schedule that are impacted when making changes to the schedule, for example when hitting the ‘scheduler’ button? Additionally, how about providing a choice to automatically schedule the work plan when making changes vs. having to hit the ‘scheduler’ button?

[Cyclops] Kindly log an ER for this.

  1. When doing data exports using a future timeframe, how do you eliminate previous projects that are closed from showing?

[Cyclops] Could you kindly send us specifics like screenshot or details on data exports you are talking about.

  1. Having the ability to share work plan views (schedule view/costing/customized) among projects and also among PM’s would increase productivity.

[Cyclops] Are you looking to provide just view capability or edit as well but at the same time could you kindly help us in better understanding the benefits of doing this.

 

0 Likes
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Micro Focus. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. As of September 1, 2017, the Material is now offered by Micro Focus, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks is historical in nature, and the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks are the property of their respective owners.