Increase the number of ENTITY_LINK fields per record

Idea ID 2702910

Increase the number of ENTITY_LINK fields per record

To be able to add applications and more functionality we need to be able to add more
ENTITY_LINK fields. This is especially needed for Request, since a lot of applications needs to link directly to Request and the max number in version 2019.08 is not enough.

Tags (1)
7 Comments
Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Status changed to: Waiting for Votes

Thank you for sharing your idea! It’s open for comments and kudos, and we’re looking forward to input from the community. Once there is enough community traction, it will be further reviewed by the product team.

Acclaimed Contributor.. Acclaimed Contributor..
Acclaimed Contributor..

Agree. We actualy need more of all fields types, but entity_link is the most important. And more lists....

Honored Contributor.
Honored Contributor.

With the release of Time Tracker and Scheduled Maintenance over the last month, I think more and more users will want to add Marketplace apps to their SMAX tenants. Entity_link is one of the key resources consumed, and therefore an important one to have more of as more apps are added to everybody's SMAX tenants.

Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Status changed to: Needs Clarification

Thanks for all the votes and comments. We are looking into this as a future product enhancement. Check the notifications box to be emailed if the status changes.

Micro Focus Expert
Micro Focus Expert
Status changed to: Under Consideration

It seems that on the last update I accidentally put this idea into 'Needs Clarification' instead of 'Under Consideration'.  Sorry if that created any confusion!

Thanks, Steve.

 

Micro Focus Frequent Contributor
Micro Focus Frequent Contributor

Hello Product team,

Any news when or on which version this will be included? Our client badly need this requirement too. Hope to hear from you. thank you.

Contributor.
Contributor.

We need this to reduce typographical errors being encoded by the teams in our operations. It is way better if we put in list to allow users to directly select than to encode items. Please have this expedited. 

The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Micro Focus. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. As of September 1, 2017, the Material is now offered by Micro Focus, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks is historical in nature, and the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks are the property of their respective owners.