Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.
2301 views

Re: NSM 2.0 - .net requirement

Marko,

I don't know if any issue necessarily with .NET Framework 2.0, but all of
the testing that has been completed thus far was done with .NET framework
1.1 SP1 which is the minimum supported version.

I will setup a machine with 2.0 framework only and rerun a subset of the
tests, and let you now how it goes.

NSM Development

"Marko K." <kautium@REREMOMOVEVEjypoly.fi> wrote in message
news:0xglg.4087$tN4.3394@prv-forum2.provo.novell.com...
> Dave wrote:
>> When I start the admin tool, it complains that I dont have .Net
>> Framework 1.1, but does actually fire up and work. I am running
>> .Net Framework 2.0.
>>
>> Are there any known issues running 2.0 instead ? I don't really feel
>> like having two versions of .Net installed !

>
> I don't know if there are any issues with .Net 2.0 and NSM, but according
> to NSM documentation, .Net 2.0 is not supported -->
>
> http://www.novell.com/documentation/esd/di_stormgr2.html
> - - - - - - - - -
> NSMAdmin has the following minimum requirements for Windows:
> - .NET 1.1 SP1 Framework installed (Does not support .Net 2.0 Framework)
> - .NET security settings adjusted if running the executable from a network
> drive
> - - - - - - - - -
>
>> On a side note - why hasn't NSM management been placed into iManager
>> (as much as I hate iManager) ? Running yet another config tool is
>> crazy to say the least - I thought novell stopped doing that.

>
> iManager sucks and that may be the reason why NSM developers made
> NSMAdmin.
>
> It sure looks like Novell tries to do everything the hard way or maybe
> someone at Novell just isn't doing his/hers job?
>
> Now we have to use NWadmin, ConsoleOne, iManager, DNS/DHCP management
> console, Remote manager and this new NSMAdmin to handle Novell products
> efficiently. Aaaarrgggghh...
>
> Sure, some standalone admin tool tasks can be made using iManager, but
> using iManager is like pulling teeths. I'm pretty sure nobody actually
> uses iManager if it is not absolutely necessary.
>
> PS. Copy and follow-ups goes to new storage-manager group
>
> --
> Make.
> kautium@REREMOMOVEVEjypoly.fi
> PS. Please remove any extras if replying via email
>



0 Likes
1 Reply
Anonymous_User Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: NSM 2.0 - .net requirement

fsfdev wrote:
> Marko,
>
> I don't know if any issue necessarily with .NET Framework 2.0, but
> all of the testing that has been completed thus far was done with
> .NET framework 1.1 SP1 which is the minimum supported version.
>
> I will setup a machine with 2.0 framework only and rerun a subset of
> the tests, and let you now how it goes.


Thanks. Btw, the original question was presented by "Dave" at older FSF
forum.

--
Make.
kautium@REREMOMOVEVEjypoly.fi
PS. Please remove any extras if replying via email


0 Likes
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Micro Focus. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. As of September 1, 2017, the Material is now offered by Micro Focus, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks is historical in nature, and the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks are the property of their respective owners.