Highlighted
Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: SQL DB question

We went with MS SQL 2005 because our DB admins have experience with
that, plus we already have a license to use it.

Shaun Pond wrote:
> Chris,
>
> ah, then I guess the answer would be a) if you already have experience
> in MW SQL, or b) If you needed to push the performance (multi-cpu, etc)
>

0 Likes
Highlighted
Absent Member.
Absent Member.

Re: SQL DB question

Jeremy,

seems like a reasonable choice 🙂

--

Shaun Pond


0 Likes
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Micro Focus. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation. Certain versions of content ("Material") accessible here may contain branding from Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. As of September 1, 2017, the Material is now offered by Micro Focus, a separately owned and operated company. Any reference to the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks is historical in nature, and the HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise/HPE marks are the property of their respective owners.